View Today's Active Threads / View New Posts / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
I Love Lucy (Sitcoms Online) / I Love Lucy links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / I Love Lucy Photo Gallery
![]() Buy I Love Lucy - The Complete Series on DVD |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Photo Galleries | News Blog | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
New on DVD/Blu-ray / Headlines |
||||
|
Welcome to the Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, search, view attachments, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Regular
Henna-rinsess
Join Date: Jan 28, 2002
Location: Somewhere in the middle of the world's longest Conga line
Posts: 471
|
Splain mentioned in another thread that he thought that Gary Morton, Lucy's 2nd husband, could have been the man whose name and address was written by Lucy on the piece of paper that Desi had found before the divorce and used it against her as a kind of blackmail. Desi described this in his book. Well, today I saw this photo that is attached below. Here is the caption:
Lucille Ball/Gary Morton Seated in Club Original caption: 1958-New York, NY: East 54th Street. Lucille Ball and Gary Morton are shown seated in the El Morocco Club. 1958. Now, I thought that Gary and Lucy didn't meet until well after she and Desi were divorced, when she was doing the play "Wildcat" in NYC? This certainly was well after 1958. During that year, Lucy and Desi were still very much married (although, very unhappy). Do you think that the date on the caption could have been a mistake? It seems like the most logical explaination. But then again, it is supposed to be the original caption, and if that's so, you'd think it would have been first published around the time that it was dated. Very very strange.
__________________
ELVIS LIVES ***** "They had one of those historical marriages, like Napoleon and Josephine, Richard and Liz--destined to be trouble but destined for them to never find anyone as passionate or as fabulous." -- Lucie Arnaz on her parents, Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Blair Warner fan.
Join Date: Dec 01, 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,751
|
That is strange!! I didnt even know about that. I need to buy Desi's book and read it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Member
Join Date: Jun 12, 2003
Posts: 1,559
|
Pretty interesting. I think the date is probably wrong though. Didn't Lucy still have long hair in 58? And I don't think she'd go out with him in public.
![]() |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Legend
Member
Join Date: Jan 04, 2001
Posts: 52,914
|
Her hair was short in 58. It was short starting with the third LDCH.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
I Love Lucy
Join Date: Mar 04, 2002
Location: MONTREAL, CANADA
Posts: 4,549
|
I agree that the year was wrong, that looks like much later, i've seen that picture. However, i knew that the story of meeting Gary and stalling about having pizza with him and all that could have been fabricated to cover up the liaison having started well before that. It is definitely NOT something i KNOW or SUSPECT but just rather something i've always wanted to know, the identity of the man's name on that slip of paper.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Member
Join Date: Jun 12, 2003
Posts: 1,559
|
Quote:
I hope the name belonged to someone more interesting than Gary! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
I Love Lucy
Join Date: Mar 04, 2002
Location: MONTREAL, CANADA
Posts: 4,549
|
Yeah, even Red Buttons would be an improvement! Well, we know it was'nt Cesar Romero!
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Member
Join Date: Jun 12, 2003
Posts: 1,559
|
Red Buttons.
![]() |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
I Love Lucy
Join Date: Mar 04, 2002
Location: MONTREAL, CANADA
Posts: 4,549
|
And it was'nt Jack Palance or Richard Burton either.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Frequent Poster
Member
Join Date: Sep 27, 2001
Posts: 189
|
Yeah the date is incorrect.
Lucy, as most in the public eye, cared too much about her image to be seen THAT close in public to another man while she was still one part of "America's most famous couple". That would've sparked way too many rumors and the media/public wouldn't have sympathized with her as they did when the divorce was finally annoucned. As Irma Kusely once said "She was not a foolish child" |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
I Love Lucy
Join Date: Mar 04, 2002
Location: MONTREAL, CANADA
Posts: 4,549
|
Exactly, that's how we know for a fact that it can't be from '58, well said too!
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|