Inteligence! Inteligence!

[Kitt]

Some don't know. Some lie. Some hope. Some wish. Some call the shots. Some call them on the shots. She, Arundhati Roy, is a truth teller.

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0402-01.htm

[Jem]

[quote]Originally posted by Kitt
[b]

(QUOTE)"Iraq. Will. Be. Liberated." (Perhaps he means that even if Iraqi people's bodies are killed, their souls will be liberated.) (QUOTE)

(QUOTE)After dropping not hundreds, but thousands of bombs on Baghdad, when a marketplace was mistakenly blown up and civilians killed - a US army spokesman implied that the Iraqis were blowing themselves up! "They're using very old stock. Their missiles go up and come down." (QUOTE)

Yeah, that's probably how George Bush will liberate Iraq. It's inevitable that Iraqi civilians won't be killed.

That's so like the USA to deny that they aren't responsible for things. Saying that the Iraqis: men, women and children blew themselves up, denying that UFOs don't exist and Roswell never happened. It's all the same thing. Something to lie about when they don't want anyone to know the truth. If any country needs to be "Liberated", it's the United States of America.

[Max Whittaker]

I'm beginning to think that all the problems we had during the Cold War was not the fault of the USSR, it was because of U.S. ignorance!

[Max Whittaker]

Originally posted by Jem


If any country needs to be "Liberated", it's the United States of America.

Maybe someone should say that to Bush.

[ClassicComedyFan2]

Actually, more Iraqi citizens have been killed by themselves (wheter blackmailed by their punk 'government' to be human shields or the debris from their futile Anti-Aircraft fire) than by the Coalition forces. But, rest assured, the soldiers of evil will be stopped, one way or another.

[Kitt]

Originally posted by ClassicComedyFan2
Actually, more Iraqi citizens have been killed by themselves

BULLSHLIT

[theshark8777]

Originally posted by Kitt
BULLSHLIT

You are all ignorant if you don't believe that Saddam uses human shields or kills his own people.

If all you people have all these problems with the USA why don't you find a new place to live. If you have it so bad here, and there is another place that would be so much better for you, why don't you move there?


Those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it.

[bandito]

Originally posted by theshark8777


You are all ignorant if you don't believe that Saddam uses human shields or kills his own people.

If all you people have all these problems with the USA why don't you find a new place to live. If you have it so bad here, and there is another place that would be so better for you, why don't you move there?


Those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it.

Well said Shark!

[Fleet]

Originally posted by Jem
If any country needs to be "Liberated", it's the United States of America.

We were... in 1776.

[Fleet]

Originally posted by theshark8777
You are all ignorant if you don't believe that Saddam uses human shields or kills his own people.

If all you people have all these problems with the USA why don't you find a new place to live. If you have it so bad here, and there is another place that would be so much better for you, why don't you move there?

Those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it.

They are ignorant, period!

They won't leave. Oh, they will keep complaining and whining, but do you notice they never actually leave? Not even Alec Baldwin.

They conveniently forget history. Or, they try to rewrite it.

[Kitt]

Originally posted by Fleet

They are ignorant, period!

They won't leave. Oh, they will keep complaining and whining, but do you notice they never actually leave? Not even Alec Baldwin.

They conveniently forget history. Or, they try to rewrite it.

Rewrite Vietnam you loudmouth, homophobe jackcrap idiot! Did America do what it said it was doing for 10 f'ing years in Vietnam or did they lie to us?.

[Fleet]

Originally posted by Kitt
Rewrite Vietnam you loudmouth, homophobe jackcrap idiot! Did America do what it said it was doing for 10 f'ing years in Vietnam or did they lie to us?.

Regarding your first sentence: Is this an example of the compassionate, understanding liberal? Or, are you doing what most liberals do- attack the other person?
Re: Vietnam... read up about Lyndon Johnson... he was sending troops out to Vietnam by night, and denying it by day (he was a liberal, by the way).
The word homophobe proves what a joke you are. As I've said before, I am a classic Cadillac fan. Sometimes we fellow Cadillac enthusiasts get together to look at each others cars, talk about them, etc. One person happens to be a homosexual. I know him quite well and his partner. I do not run away from them (since I am not afraid of them). And, I've yet to either discuss or debate their lifestyle. Like I've said before, you are wrong (again).
There is also an annual car event called "heaps of fun." A large portion of participants are homosexuals. Again, I attend and if I see an interesting Cadillac, I talk to the owner about it.
Me a "homophobe?"

[Kitt]

Originally posted by Fleet

Regarding your first sentence: Is this an example of the compassionate, understanding liberal?

Don't label ne in your dreams. If I saw you on the street, after what you've said to me, I'd knock your smartass teeth out for being the Jackass that you are.

[Czas na Zywiec]

Originally posted by Fleet

Regarding your first sentence: Is this an example of the compassionate, understanding liberal? Or, are you doing what most liberals do- attack the other person?

Seems not so long ago that a certain someone was personally attacking AKA for what he's done in the past. Can we say double standard?

Originally posted by Fleet

Me a "homophobe?"

That's what they usually call someone who judges a person and decides they're not equal to you just on the basis of sexual orientation.

[Fleet]

Originally posted by Original Prankster
That's what they usually call someone who judges a person and decides they're not equal to you just on the basis of sexual orientation.

I thought it meant someone who is "afraid" of them? Well, anyway, I don't judge them.
Re: Double standard? Not quite- what I said about AKA was accurate (about the smoking thing). Now, if I said he was dumb or something, that would have been my opinion and that would be a double standard.