Michael Moore blasts Bush over federal probe

[ABlairican Pie]

MSNBC.com


Michael Moore blasts Bush over federal probe

Filmmaker says he’s targeted because of new health-care documentary


“I understand why the Bush administration is coming after me — I have tried to help the very people they refuse to help, but until George W. Bush outlaws helping your fellow man, I have broken no laws and I have nothing to hide,” Michael Moore wrote.


The Associated Press
Updated: 11:20 a.m. PT May 11, 2007

LOS ANGELES - Filmmaker Michael Moore has asked the Bush administration to call off an investigation of his trip to Cuba to get treatment for ailing Sept. 11 rescue workers for a segment in his upcoming health-care expose, “Sicko.”

Moore, who made the hit documentary “Fahrenheit 9/11” assailing President Bush’s handling of Sept. 11, said in a letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on Friday that the White House may have opened the investigation for political reasons.

“For five and a half years, the Bush administration has ignored and neglected the heroes of the 9/11 community,” Moore said in the letter, which he posted on the liberal Web site Daily Kos. “These heroic first responders have been left to fend for themselves, without coverage and without care.

“I understand why the Bush administration is coming after me — I have tried to help the very people they refuse to help, but until George W. Bush outlaws helping your fellow man, I have broken no laws and I have nothing to hide.”

A ‘healing film’
Harvey Weinstein, whose Weinstein Co. is releasing “Sicko,” told The Associated Press the movie is a “healing film” that could bring opponents together over the ills of America’s health-care system.

“This time, we didn’t want the fight, because the movie unites both sides,” Weinstein said. “We’ve shown the movie to Republicans. Both sides of the bench love the film. The pharmaceutical industry won’t like the movie. HMOs will try to run us out of town, but that’s not relevant to the situation.

“The whole campaign this time was not to be incendiary. It was, can Michael Moore bring both sides together?”

The health-care industry Moore skewers in “Sicko” was a major contributor to Bush’s 2004 re-election campaign and to Republican candidates over the last four years, Moore wrote.

“I can understand why that industry’s main recipient of its contributions — President Bush — would want to harass, intimidate and potentially prevent this film from having its widest possible audience,” Moore wrote.

Treasury officials in Washington said Friday they would have no comment on the contents of Moore’s letter, citing a policy against discussing specific investigations being conducted by Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, the agency that enforces the trade embargo against Cuba.

“Generally speaking, as administrators and enforcers of U.S. sanctions, OFAC is required to investigate potential violations of these programs,” Treasury spokeswoman AnnMarie Hauser said. “In doing so, OFAC issues hundreds of letters each year asking for additional information when possible sanctions violations have occurred.”

OFAC notified Moore in a letter dated May 2 that it was conducting a civil investigation for possible violations of the U.S. trade embargo restricting travel to Cuba.

‘The timing is amazing’
Moore questioned the timing of the investigation, noting that “Sicko” premieres May 19 at the Cannes Film Festival and debuts in U.S. theaters June 29. The Bush administration knew of his plans to travel to Cuba since last October, said Moore, who went there in March with about 10 ailing workers involved in the rescue effort at the World Trade Center ruins.

Weinstein said the investigation would only help publicize the film.

“The timing is amazing. You would think that we originated this. It reads like a fiction best-seller,” Weinstein said.

The Weinstein Co. said it has hired David Boies, the chief attorney in Al Gore’s recount battle against Bush in the 2000 presidential election, to help on the “Sicko” case.

Cuba on Friday characterized Moore as a victim of censorship and the U.S. trade embargo.

The Communist Party daily Granma called the 45-year-old U.S. travel and trade sanctions “a criminal action that has cost lives and grave consequences for the inhabitants of the island,” as well as Americans.

“Any resemblance to McCarthyism is no coincidence,” the newspaper opined, referring to the political witch hunt that U.S. Sen. Joseph McCarthy carried out against suspected American communists in the 1950s.

The U.S. government’s targeting of Moore “confirms the imperial philosophy of censorship” by American officials, it added.

20 days to provide details
U.S. State Department officials on Friday declined to comment on Granma’s criticisms of the American government and referred calls to the Treasury Department.

OFAC’s letter to Moore noted that he had applied in October 2006 for permission as a full-time journalist to travel to Cuba, but that the agency had not made any determination on his request.

The agency gave Moore 20 business days to provide details on his Cuba trip and the names of those who accompanied him.


Moore won an Academy Award for best documentary with his 2002 gun-control film “Bowling for Columbine” and scolded Bush in his Oscar acceptance speech as the war in Iraq was just getting under way.

The investigation has given master promoter Moore another jolt of publicity just before the release of one of his films. “Fahrenheit 9/11” premiered at Cannes in 2004 amid a public quarrel between Moore and the Walt Disney Co., which refused to let subsidiary Miramax release the film because of its political content.

Miramax bosses Harvey and Bob Weinstein ended up releasing the film on their own and later left to form the Weinstein Co., distributor of “Sicko.”


“This is ‘Fahrenheit’ all over again. ‘Let’s pressure somebody.’ Last time it was Disney, this time it’s direct,” Harvey Weinstein said.

“Fahrenheit 9/11” won the top prize at Cannes and went on to become the top-grossing documentary ever with $119 million.


© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

[TJL]

Why did he go to Cuba?

[Janice]

[Dr. John Becker]

Originally Posted by TJL

Why did he go to Cuba?

I wish he would stay there.

[TJL]

I'm just kind of curious as to why he would go to Cuba for this movie... do they know something about medicine that the U.S. doesn't?

I am sure we'll find out in the movie. I guess.

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Dr. John Becker

I wish he would stay there.

Cuba refuses to take him.

[GeorgeWBushGOP]

so ... he uses 9-11 heroes as PROPS for his propaganda? shameful!

and, does he go to Cuba for HIS healthcare?????

[Janice]

Originally Posted by TJL

I'm just kind of curious as to why he would go to Cuba for this movie...

He's probably buddies with his hero Castro.

[GeorgeWBushGOP]

Hey Michael In Bush's case he has 12 years of intelligence reports around the world that reached across many administrations for his justification for the war.

And the bill that was passed by Congress listed over 20 reasons for justification, not just one.


Moore, I dont believe has intelligence reports that span the globe justifying his position.

The more you say Bush Lied and lay the blame souly on him the more your argument becomes discredited, because that argument used to be used by the same anti-american types, Yeah Saddam had weapons, because the USA gave them to him.

And now all of a sudden you Saddam never had weapons and its Bush's fault.

FYI Saddam Hussein did have WMD programs and its far more likely he moved them out of the country or hid them away especially considering the LONG build up to the invasion.

NY Times asks Government to shut down website showing Iraqi Documents with BluePrints on how to build Atomic Bombs.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/wo...erland&emc=rss

Evidence that weapons were moved,,,


http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Art...e.asp?ID=21489

All of Moore's evidence is easily refuted and not backed up by a bipartisan congressional vote but backed up by hollywood types that have a personal hatred for Bush with the no matter what he does, Bush is wrong mentality

[RWCTV]

A Publicity Stunt:

This charge by Moore is a cheap attempt to drum up publicity for people to see his movie, to get people to support universal health care, which would prompt them to vote for a fellow liberal who supports that issue in 2008. That's all. The whole "Bush is after me for exposing him" image is old and tired, and frankly does not work. People are tired of it, and tired of him.

[Central Perk]

Originally Posted by GeorgeWBushGOP

so ... he uses 9-11 heroes as PROPS for his propaganda? shameful!

Maybe so, but it's not like Bush or other politicians on both sides of the aisle haven't used 9/11 for political gain.

[Seth]

Wow, Michael Moore blasted George Bush? Imagine that.

Is the sky blue?

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Central Perk

Maybe so, but it's not like Bush or other politicians on both sides of the aisle haven't used 9/11 for political gain.

How have they used 9/11 for "political gain?" It affected the whole country. It revealed how real the threat of terrorism is.

[RWCTV]

Originally Posted by Central Perk

Maybe so, but it's not like Bush or other politicians on both sides of the aisle haven't used 9/11 for political gain.

Bush and Cheney always brought up 9/11 as a reminder of the stakes that are facing us. The stakes still remain high, and islamic radicalism is a threat now more than ever. So understanding the threat in that context, Bush and Cheney never used 9/11 for POLITICAL motives. It's just that Bush and Cheney were the ones who, by action did what they felt they had to do to keep America safe. And so far it has worked. Whenever Kerry mentioned how he would keep America safe, his words sounded good, but his actions contradicted them, and therefore could not be trusted on the issue of National Security.

And this was nothing new. Zell Miller, a Georgia Democrat, went down the list, citing everything that Kerry opposed and that has kept us safe for decades.