Sitcoms Online - Main Page / Message Boards - Main Page / News Blog / Photo Galleries / DVD Reviews / Buy TV Shows on DVD and Blu-ray

View Today's Active Threads / View New Posts / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board


Unsolved Mysteries Online Main Page / Message Board / Show History / Episode Guide (1987-2002) / Expanded Episode Guide #2 / Expanded Episode Guide #3 / Case Updates / Wiki / Official Site / Lifetime Site / Lifetime Schedule / Related Links / True Crime Shows Message Board / All Other Cases Message Board / Buy The Best of Unsolved Mysteries DVD / Buy Unsolved Mysteries - The Ultimate Collection DVD

Unsolved Mysteries: Original Robert Stack Episodes - The Complete First Season

Watch or Buy Unsolved Mysteries: Original Robert Stack Episodes - The Complete First Season on Amazon Instant Video
/
Season 2
/ Season 3 / Season 4 /
Season 5
/ Season 6 / Season 7 /
Season 8
/ Season 9 / Season 10

Unsolved Mysteries with Dennis Farina Episodes

Watch or Buy Unsolved Mysteries with Dennis Farina - The Complete First Season Episodes on Amazon Instant Video
/ Season 2 / Season 3 / Season 4 / Season 5 / Season 6 / Season 7 / Season 8

Unsolved Mysteries: UFOs

Buy Unsolved Mysteries: UFOs DVD Set
Unsolved Mysteries: Ghosts

Buy Unsolved Mysteries: Ghosts DVD Set
Unsolved Mysteries: Miracles

Buy Unsolved Mysteries: Miracles DVD Set
Unsolved Mysteries: Bizarre Murders

Buy Unsolved Mysteries: Bizarre Murders DVD Set
Unsolved Mysteries: Psychics

Buy Unsolved Mysteries: Psychics DVD Set
Unsolved Mysteries: Strange Legends

Buy Unsolved Mysteries: Strange Legends DVD Set

Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums  

Go Back   Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums > Unsolved Mysteries
User Name
Password


Welcome to the Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, search, view attachments, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

SitcomsOnline.com News Blog Headlines Twitter Facebook Instagram RSS

Pop Picks Up 2nd Season of Hollywood Darlings; South Park Still Strong in Season 21
69th Annual Primetime Emmy Award Winners; Mom Also Heads to CMT
Sitcom Stars on Talk Shows; This Week in Sitcoms (Week of September 18, 2017)
SitcomsOnline Digest: Fuller House Set for Season 3 Debut on Full House 30th Anniversary
Fri-Yay: BoJack Horseman - The Best Show on TV?; Not Kidding, Jim Carrey Joins Showtime Comedy
TBS Renews Three Comedies; Hallmark Channel's Countdown to Christmas 2017
Decades Salutes The Bob Newhart Show for 45th Anniversary; Netflix Gets Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond


New on DVD/Blu-ray (August/September)

Father Knows Best - Season Six Diff'rent Strokes - The Complete Sixth Season Alice - The Complete Fifth Season Rhoda - Season Four Brooklyn Nine-Nine - Season Four

08/01 - Alice - The Complete Fifth Season (WBShop.com)
08/01 - Crashing - The Complete First Season (Blu-ray)
08/15 - Rhoda - Season Four
08/22 - Brooklyn Nine-Nine - Season Four
08/29 - Will & Grace - Season One (Universal)
09/01 - Angie - The Complete Collection
09/05 - Just Shoot Me! - The Complete Series
09/05 - Kevin Can Wait - Season One
09/06 - Better Things - The Complete First Season
09/06 - You're the Worst - The Complete Third Season
09/12 - The Big Bang Theory - The Complete Tenth Season (Blu-ray)
09/12 - Coach - The Complete Series
09/12 - The Goldbergs - The Complete Third Season
09/12 - The Goldbergs - The Complete Fourth Season
09/12 - People of Earth - The Complete First Season
09/12 - Veep - The Complete Sixth Season (Blu-ray)
09/19 - Living Single - The Complete Second Season
09/19 - Modern Family - The Complete Eighth Season
09/26 - Ned and Stacey - The Complete Series
More TV DVD Releases / DVD Reviews Archive / SitcomsOnline Digest


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2007, 04:17 AM   #1
Thiussat
Forum Regular
Member
 
Thiussat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 09, 2007
Posts: 542
Default Ladner Case vs. Ives & Henry Case

I have made a couple of "vs." posts lately because I feel certain cases are quite similar. However, I had never seen the Norman Ladner case until tonight and I must say that the first thing that popped into my mind was the Ives & Henry case. These two cases are not just similar, but eeringly similar. I am probably not the first to make this observation, and would like to hear fellow poster's opinions on this notion.

Take away the fact that Ives and Henry happened to be laid on train tracks after their death, and these two cases appear nearly identical. All 3 boys were right around 17 years old. Ives and Henry had a .22 rifle and were walking rural land in Arkansas. Ladner also had a .22 rifle as was walking rural land in Mississippi. Both cases were ruled accidents or suicides by authorities. In both cases the parents have persisted in their own investigations and have turned up links to organized drug smuggling, and in both cases the police appear to be somewhat involved in a cover-up (there is more evidence of this in the Ives and Henry case though). All three deaths appear to be a case of the kids being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The motive for murder in both cases appears to be the silence of a witness to high level drug smuggling.

I wonder if Ives' and Henry's parents have ever been in contact with Ladner's parents?

At any rate, a very interesting case and I am glad I got to see it before LRW takes the show off the air soon.

Regards.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: All of my posts are opinions based strictly on my viewing of the "Unsolved Mysteries" television show and should in no way reflect or imply that I have any intimate knowledge of any of the cases presented. Everything I say is merely my opinion based on my viewing of the show.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 10:57 AM   #2
mozartpc27
Forum Regular
Vigilante Logician
 
Join Date: Mar 09, 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 794
Default

I tink the "evidence" for a dug smuggling operation in the Ladner case is just that thing that his father found, which a retired officer who did not appear on camera said was similar to the sort of device that smugglers used to help guide planes to the ground. Pretty weak if you ask me - there was nothing found at the scene to suggest another party or parties were present.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 04:30 PM   #3
Thiussat
Forum Regular
Member
 
Thiussat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 09, 2007
Posts: 542
Default

Well, there is really not much evidence putting anyone else at the Ives and Henry scene either. Most of the evidence is based upon rumors about drug smuggling and the Mena drug ring. However, in the Ives and Henry case there were a few witnesses who claim they "heard" people talk about being at the scene. There are no such witnesses in the Ladner case based on the UM segment (but there were not witnesses in the Ives and Henry case based on UM either. All of the Mena stuff came out after the UM segment aired.)

The reason I am suspicious of the Ladner case is because the police did not even attempt to find the bullet that killed him. They based their entire conclusion on "how his body fell." This is pretty dubious to me. At the very least the bullet should have been found and matched to his rifle.

I wonder what caliber of rifle Ladner was carrying? The father said the bullet he and his wife found was "too long for his gun." I assume Ladner probably was carrying a .22 caliber rifle, and thus, the boy's rifle may have only been chambered for a .22 "short" or .22 "long" ammunition, and was not chambered for a .22 "long rifle." This is just speculation on my part, however.

I admit the family could be fabricating the story, but it seems quite creative for them to engender some story about a radio device, about finding a bullet beneath Norman's body that was bloody and had bone fragments on it, and about having a man tell the mother face to face to call off her investigation because she would never find out who killed her son. Of course, it would have given more credibility to their story if they would have shown the radio device or the bullet on camera or had the former DEA agent friend appear on the segment.

I am not saying this case is as suspicious as the Ives/Henry case, but I feel the police investigation was incomplete when they reached their conclusion.

Later.

Last edited by Thiussat : 05-07-2007 at 04:45 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 06:17 PM   #4
peachysquirt21
Forum Regular
Member
 
peachysquirt21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 27, 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 454
Default

I believe the bullet they found they turned it over to LE & never got it back.

I think it's bit of a stretch that they would fabricate a story.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 05:02 PM   #5
CanadianUMFan
Frequent Poster
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 21, 2007
Location: St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thiussat
Well, there is really not much evidence putting anyone else at the Ives and Henry scene either. Most of the evidence is based upon rumors about drug smuggling and the Mena drug ring. However, in the Ives and Henry case there were a few witnesses who claim they "heard" people talk about being at the scene. There are no such witnesses in the Ladner case based on the UM segment (but there were not witnesses in the Ives and Henry case based on UM either. All of the Mena stuff came out after the UM segment aired.)

The reason I am suspicious of the Ladner case is because the police did not even attempt to find the bullet that killed him. They based their entire conclusion on "how his body fell." This is pretty dubious to me. At the very least the bullet should have been found and matched to his rifle.

I wonder what caliber of rifle Ladner was carrying? The father said the bullet he and his wife found was "too long for his gun." I assume Ladner probably was carrying a .22 caliber rifle, and thus, the boy's rifle may have only been chambered for a .22 "short" or .22 "long" ammunition, and was not chambered for a .22 "long rifle." This is just speculation on my part, however.

I admit the family could be fabricating the story, but it seems quite creative for them to engender some story about a radio device, about finding a bullet beneath Norman's body that was bloody and had bone fragments on it, and about having a man tell the mother face to face to call off her investigation because she would never find out who killed her son. Of course, it would have given more credibility to their story if they would have shown the radio device or the bullet on camera or had the former DEA agent friend appear on the segment.

I am not saying this case is as suspicious as the Ives/Henry case, but I feel the police investigation was incomplete when they reached their conclusion.

Later.

I just saw this Ladner case today on the Mystery Channel here in Canada. I too thought about the "Boys on the Tracks" case after I watched this one and rumoured connections to drug smuggling. I do find it puzzling how the police did a "half-assed" job of investigating this Ladner case. I guess that there are no updates on this case?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 05:48 PM   #6
hostedbyrobertstack
Forum Regular
Member
 
hostedbyrobertstack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 23, 2007
Location: OH
Posts: 348
Default

Both of these cases are probably the two that get at me the most. Something about these cases makes me feel really helpless. I know what it is like to be in certain situations and for these kids to be in a situation and end up being murdered awful to imagine. Looking at their pictures it could be anyone(I know that's the case with any mystery) but its because they were so close to my age and were doing things any teenager would be doing. It sucks that it is still unsolved, another one of those cases that should not have even gone unsolved. Especially after all the talk that the authorities were corrupt. The south seems like a different country sometimes(no offense).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 02:42 PM   #7
CowboyStudTied
Frequent Poster
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 06, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 53
Default

they can be related what about the guy with camo on? what is his part in this?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 07:44 PM   #8
Blackout
Senior Member
Sart Bimpson
 
Blackout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 13, 2003
Location: where the sun rises
Posts: 2,192
Default

arkansas and mississippi...two completely different area's
__________________
MOHRIOR
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 08:46 PM   #9
MegtheEgg86
Senior Member
Member
 
MegtheEgg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 4,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackout805
arkansas and mississippi...two completely different area's

How do you mean?
__________________
"Why is she lying?, it makes me wonder. What is she hiding?, it makes me wonder."

Go Vols!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 09:53 PM   #10
Blackout
Senior Member
Sart Bimpson
 
Blackout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 13, 2003
Location: where the sun rises
Posts: 2,192
Default

just because someone was murdered in one state in the woods over drugs, doesn't mean that the person murdered in the 2nd state in the woods was related to the same thing
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 09:27 PM   #11
CowboyStudTied
Frequent Poster
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 06, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 53
Default

they are very silmilar
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 08:40 AM   #12
justins5256
Senior Member
Member
 
justins5256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 08, 2002
Posts: 3,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyStudTied
they are very silmilar

were they found hogtied with there boots on? i thought they were
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 09:49 AM   #13
TracyLynnS
Senior Member
Don't Look Up
 
TracyLynnS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 07, 2009
Posts: 3,087
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justins5256
were they found hogtied with there boots on? i thought they were

roflol!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 12:38 PM   #14
Zlatko
Forum Regular
Member
 
Zlatko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 356
Default

I'm surprised that no one has brought up the two boys who were killed in Oklahoma. It's been said that they were killed in the same fashion as Don, and Kevin. Both were lying motionless on a train track. I've been trying to find more details on the case, but to no avail.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2009, 06:09 PM   #15
MegtheEgg86
Senior Member
Member
 
MegtheEgg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 4,448
Default

Last September, I spent the entirety of my evenings for a week searching Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) accident records for both the Ives/Henry incident as well as the mysterious 1984 Oklahoma accident on the advice of my husband, who is a railroad employee.

The former was much easier to search for as I had an exact date, location, and knew the railroad involved--but I found nothing that even remotely described the Ives/Henry incident. There were a small number of reportable incidents in August 1987 involving the Union Pacific Railroad in Saline County (as well as the surrounding counties, which I also searched), including at least one report of an individual trespassing on railroad property, but I did not find anything about two people being run over by a UP train on 23 August 1987 in Bryant, Arkansas.

I remember feeling very uncomfortable the entire week because an accident of Ives/Henry magnitude would DEFINITELY be on file with the FRA, and not being able to find it unsettled me. It would have as well been on Union Pacific records, but I found nothing there when I searched the company's archive.

I also did not find anything detailing the 1984 Oklahoma incident. I can't recall if the record simply was not there or if I wasn't able to use the search engine because I didn't have an exact date or railroad for the incident, but I do remember that I saw no file detailing an accident fitting that description.


I don't understand why the Ives/Henry incident would not be on file with the FRA, if that's truly the case. One person walking down railroad tracks is considered a reportable incident to the FRA (and there are many of those in the archive), as are grade crossing accidents, derailments, spillages of any sort, personnel injuries, etc...and certainly people being run over by trains.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Frequently Asked Questions

1) How do I contact Unsolved Mysteries with information on segments?

If you any information on cases, you can contact them via:

Website: www.unsolved.com

Contact form on official Unsolved Mysteries site

Please note that their old mailing address and 1-800 phone number no longer work.


2) Where can I watch Unsolved Mysteries?

Lifetime

Lifetime Schedule / Lifetime Site

Escape Schedule / Escape Site



Although the administrators and moderators of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message. The owners of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.5.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.