View Today's Active Threads / View New Posts / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Three's Company (Sitcoms Online) / PB's Three's Company Page: Jack's Bistro / Three's Company links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Three's Company Photo Gallery
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 1 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 2 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 3 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 4 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 5 on DVD |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Photo Galleries | News Blog | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
New on DVD/Blu-ray / Headlines |
||||
|
Welcome to the Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, search, view attachments, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Legend
Researching Old TV Info
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Location: StinkaDelphia
Posts: 80,395
|
Do you agree that Cindy's Goofiness and Clumsiness made it impossible to see her as a woman with SEX APPEAL?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Sep 24, 2003
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 505
|
I dissagree, IMO, Cindy was the sexiest!
![]() |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Celebrity
~
Join Date: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Behind the Couch
Posts: 34,859
|
Ok I'm not a guy, but I highly doubt there's any man out there who would look at Cindy and go, "That goofy, clumsy personality of hers just doesn't do a thing for me." That's probably the last thing on their minds when looking at her.
__________________
Merry Christmas! ![]() |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Member
Join Date: Sep 02, 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 7,025
|
To me, the clumsiness of hers was more like a baby sister or something. Cindy's legs was the most attractive thing about her, especially when she was wearing shorts.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Member
Join Date: Nov 07, 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,690
|
Quote:
She has nice legs, that's for sure! As far as her goofiness; I like people who are goofy! And her being pretty just make it even better! ![]()
__________________
Luke: "... Is the dark side stronger?" Yoda: "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive." --------------------------------------------------- Yoda: "Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny." My First Blog:http://saturdayfunnies.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Forum Legend I'm Rich Bitch
Join Date: Feb 03, 2002
Location: What Ain't No Country I Ever Heard Of...They Speak English in What?
Posts: 62,155
|
I think Chrissy was at her sexiest in the beginning of the show. After that, she became too much of a cartoon character.
__________________
The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3 Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Sep 24, 2003
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
Umm...we're talking about Cindy, not Chrissy. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
ok, i'm not a man either but ITA. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Frequent Poster
Member
Join Date: Dec 23, 2004
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
excuse me, but chrissy was just BEING herself in her two last seasons of the show unlike the earlier seasons of the show. She was just "another" janet when the show started, period. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Frequent Poster
Member
Join Date: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 62
|
There should have been more Cindy and Jack episodes. They had great chemistry together and were very funny. Too bad Cindy and Janet wasn't believeable as friends. That's why they brought in Terri.
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Mar 19, 2003
Location: Somerset, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 941
|
Quote:
Actually, Jack & Cindy were believable as friends... too believable actually. The producers felt that the sexual innuendo and the 'will they, or won't they' aspect of the show had diminished with the addition of Cindy since she was too much like a sister. Cindy Snow was not the kind of character to tell sex jokes or to have sex jokes revolve around; it would've come off as false. She was innocent like Chrissy but no way near as naive. Janet Wood was more accessible in that area, but her role of putting off Jack's advances, in particular when it came to him and Chrissy, was far too ingrained in the audience's consciousness for that to be enough to carry the show. She did play a part in it, but it wasn't nearly enough. Again, Janet wasn't naive and could smell more than half of the advances that came her way. Chrissy was brilliant in this aspect since her sexiness, and the innuendo that came with it, revolved around her without her even being aware of it. She was truly unaware of how she looked and didn't think she was all that, which further accentuated her appeal. The producers tried to find that in another 'Chrissy' but too much of Chrissy lied within Suzanne. Suzanne was the heart of the character and the producers thought that by putting in another blonde and writing her jokes, they could create a suitable substitute for Chrissy. It didn't happen. I know people like to trumpet about Suzanne's greed & arrogance, but this was clearly a case of the producers thinking too much of themselves. They were clearly arrogant thinking they could create another 'Chrissy' with any new face that stepped into the role. Why it worked with Priscilla Barnes' Terri is because Jack & Terri weren't as close, especially in the beginning. They did indeed care for each other, but they were not nearly as 'brother-sister' as Jack was with Chrissy & Cindy. There was a bit of tension with Terri & Jack, which was minimal but it needed to be there for it to not be 'icky' when Jack would make advance comments towards her. Otherwise, there'd be a sense of incest going on if that underlying tension didn't exist. Jack & Terri did care for and love each other, but it was more friendly love, not family love. I'm not sure if the producers sensed this and arranged for this to happen or if it was just a lucky accident, but it worked nonetheless. There you have it... Ed
__________________
save water... shower with a friend...
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
That '70s Girl
Join Date: Jan 18, 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,859
|
I like your explanation about this. It actually makes a lot of sense to me now that you worded it this way. I don't think anyone(*coughtheproducers*) should assume that a great character could be replaced like that- the magic is gone and there's no sense in trying to relive it. I'm actually glad they brought Terri in when they did(same with Cindy, although she's not my favorite blonde roomate) because the show needed a pick me up. It's the same principle with the landlords- as much as I love the Ropers, their sexual jokes were getting stale and the show needed a boost. I think Three's Company was so successful because each character brought a different aspect to the show and once it was getting old(the jokes and repetoires) it was changed around(not by choice but it happened). Overall, what I mean to say, is I love all the characters and I'm glad they stuck around as long as they did
![]() Quote:
__________________
Live a little be a gypsy get around http://www.librarything.com/profile/skelterhelter http://retrogirl82.dvdaf.com/owned formerly Retrogirl82 |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
Why r ur postings always so long? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Mar 19, 2003
Location: Somerset, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 941
|
Quote:
Excuse me, but my posts aren't that long. Ever read a book? Still, if you're being serious, all I can say is if you don't like them, then don't read them. I was offering some insight and I think it had value. Much more intelligent than some of the posts here that consist of spelling the word 'are' as 'r' and the word 'your' as 'ur'. Sorry, but that smacks of laziness. No wonder we americans appear to be the lowest in education world-wide. We look dumber and dumber as time goes on. I'd write more but I wouldn't want to be 'too long'... Ed |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Forum Regular
Member
Join Date: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
OK. cool, much better. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|