Sitcoms Online - Main Page / Message Boards - Main Page / Photo Galleries / DVD Reviews / News Blog / Buy TV Shows on DVD

View Today's Active Threads / View New Posts / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board

Three's Company (Sitcoms Online) / PB's Three's Company Page: Jack's Bistro / Three's Company links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Three's Company Photo Gallery


Three's Company - Season 1

Buy Three's Company - Season 1 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 2

Buy Three's Company - Season 2 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 3

Buy Three's Company - Season 3 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 4

Buy Three's Company - Season 4 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 5

Buy Three's Company - Season 5 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 6

Buy Three's Company - Season 6 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 7

Buy Three's Company - Season 7 on DVD
Three's Company - Season 8

Buy Three's Company - Season 8 on DVD
Three's Company - Capturing the Laughter - Jack's Favroties

Buy Three's Company - Capturing the Laughter - Jack's Favorites on DVD
Three's Company - Capturing the Laughter - Janet's Favroties

Buy Three's Company - Capturing the Laughter - Janet's Favorites on DVD

Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums  

Go Back   Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums > 1970s Sitcoms > Three's Company
User Name
Password


New on DVD/Blu-ray / Headlines
New on DVD/Blu-ray (May)

30 Rock - Season 7 (The Final Season) Roseanne - The Complete Series (Mill Creek) Laverne & Shirley - The Sixth Season

05/07 - The Dick Van Dyke Show - Season Two (Blu-ray)
05/07 - Leave it to Beaver - 20 Timeless Episodes (Slim Tin)
05/07 - 30 Rock - Season 7 (The Final Season)
05/07 - Private Practice - The Complete Sixth Season / Review
05/07 - Rookie Blue - The Complete Third Season
05/14 - Roseanne - The Complete Ninth Season (Mill Creek)
05/14 - Roseanne - The Complete Series (Mill Creek)
05/14 - That '70s Show - The Complete Series (Mill Creek)
05/14 - 3rd Rock from the Sun - The Complete Series (Mill Creek)
05/14 - Highway to Heaven - The Complete First Season (Mill Creek)
05/21 - Growing Pains - The Complete Third Season
05/21 - Laverne & Shirley - The Sixth Season / Review
05/28 - Covert Affairs - Season Three
05/28 - Mighty Morphin Power Rangers - Season 2, Volume 2
More TV DVD Releases / DVD Reviews Archive / Digital Digest

SitcomsOnline.com News Blog Headlines:

NBC Midseason Pilot Review: Save Me - Premieres May 23; TV One Orders 4th Season of Sitcom Love That Girl!

New Sitcom My Crazy Roommate Coming to Bounce TV; Episodic Review: Modern Family - "Goodnight, Gracie" - Season Finale Airing Tonight on ABC

2013-14 New Sitcoms Preview; TV Land Schedule Shake-Up, Home Improvement Back in Early Evening

Fox Midseason Pilot Review: The Goodwin Games - Premieres May 20; Fox to Air Anger Management Episodes in June

Week 34 TV Ratings and Analysis; How the Sitcoms Did

Digital Digest: Family Ties, The Office, and More in August; Route 66 - The Complete Fourth Season DVD Review

USA Network Upfront 2013: First Comedies Ordered, Plus Modern Family Reruns; Sitcom Stars on Talk Shows (Week of May 20, 2013)

The CW Upfront 2013-14: Fall 2013 Schedule; COZI TV Launching Another Original

CBS Upfront 2013-14: Fall 2013 Schedule; Episodic Review: Modern Family - "Games People Play" - Airing Tonight on ABC

ABC Upfront 2013-14: Fall 2013 Schedule; Episodic Review: New Girl - "Elaine's Big Day" - Season Finale Airing Tonight on Fox

Fox Upfront 2013-14: Fall 2013 Schedule; TBS Goes to the Ground Floor With Bill Lawrence

Welcome to the Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, search, view attachments, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2004, 09:40 PM   #1
TVFactFan
Forum Legend
Researching Old TV Info
 
TVFactFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Location: StinkaDelphia
Posts: 80,395
Default Question for the guys in regards to Cindy Snow

Do you agree that Cindy's Goofiness and Clumsiness made it impossible to see her as a woman with SEX APPEAL?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2004, 10:00 PM   #2
JAldridge86
Forum Regular
Member
 
JAldridge86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 24, 2003
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 505
Default

I dissagree, IMO, Cindy was the sexiest!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2004, 10:04 PM   #3
dandelion wine
Forum Celebrity
~
 
dandelion wine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Behind the Couch
Posts: 34,859
Default

Ok I'm not a guy, but I highly doubt there's any man out there who would look at Cindy and go, "That goofy, clumsy personality of hers just doesn't do a thing for me." That's probably the last thing on their minds when looking at her.
__________________
Fans of Jon-Erik Hexum

Merry Christmas!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2004, 10:14 AM   #4
GARFIELDKOOL
Senior Member
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 02, 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 7,025
Default

To me, the clumsiness of hers was more like a baby sister or something. Cindy's legs was the most attractive thing about her, especially when she was wearing shorts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2004, 10:51 AM   #5
Sterling Holobyte
Senior Member
Member
 
Sterling Holobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 07, 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,690
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GARFIELDKOOL
To me, the clumsiness of hers was more like a baby sister or something. Cindy's legs was the most attractive thing about her, especially when she was wearing shorts.

She has nice legs, that's for sure!
As far as her goofiness; I like people who are goofy! And her being pretty just make it even better!
__________________
Luke: "... Is the dark side stronger?"
Yoda: "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

---------------------------------------------------
Yoda: "Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny."

My First Blog:http://saturdayfunnies.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2004, 03:35 PM   #6
Brian Damage
Moderator
Forum Legend
I'm Rich Bitch
 
Brian Damage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 03, 2002
Location: What Ain't No Country I Ever Heard Of...They Speak English in What?
Posts: 62,155
Default

I think Chrissy was at her sexiest in the beginning of the show. After that, she became too much of a cartoon character.
__________________
The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3

Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2004, 06:00 PM   #7
JAldridge86
Forum Regular
Member
 
JAldridge86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 24, 2003
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Damage
I think Chrissy was at her sexiest in the beginning of the show. After that, she became too much of a cartoon character.


Umm...we're talking about Cindy, not Chrissy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2004, 07:25 PM   #8
MoonFlower
Forum Regular
Member
 
MoonFlower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by little insomniac
Ok I'm not a guy, but I highly doubt there's any man out there who would look at Cindy and go, "That goofy, clumsy personality of hers just doesn't do a thing for me." That's probably the last thing on their minds when looking at her.


ok, i'm not a man either but ITA.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 09:01 PM   #9
Professor Plum
Frequent Poster
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2004
Posts: 127
Default Chrissy was REAL thing in season 4 & 5!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Damage
I think Chrissy was at her sexiest in the beginning of the show. After that, she became too much of a cartoon character.

excuse me, but chrissy was just BEING herself in her two last seasons of the show unlike the earlier seasons of the show. She was just "another" janet when the show started, period.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 09:29 PM   #10
ClarenceAlabama
Frequent Poster
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 62
Default

There should have been more Cindy and Jack episodes. They had great chemistry together and were very funny. Too bad Cindy and Janet wasn't believeable as friends. That's why they brought in Terri.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2005, 11:21 AM   #11
Edster2973
Forum Regular
Member
 
Edster2973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 19, 2003
Location: Somerset, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarenceAlabama
There should have been more Cindy and Jack episodes. They had great chemistry together and were very funny. Too bad Cindy and Janet wasn't believeable as friends. That's why they brought in Terri.

Actually, Jack & Cindy were believable as friends... too believable actually. The producers felt that the sexual innuendo and the 'will they, or won't they' aspect of the show had diminished with the addition of Cindy since she was too much like a sister. Cindy Snow was not the kind of character to tell sex jokes or to have sex jokes revolve around; it would've come off as false. She was innocent like Chrissy but no way near as naive.

Janet Wood was more accessible in that area, but her role of putting off Jack's advances, in particular when it came to him and Chrissy, was far too ingrained in the audience's consciousness for that to be enough to carry the show. She did play a part in it, but it wasn't nearly enough. Again, Janet wasn't naive and could smell more than half of the advances that came her way.

Chrissy was brilliant in this aspect since her sexiness, and the innuendo that came with it, revolved around her without her even being aware of it. She was truly unaware of how she looked and didn't think she was all that, which further accentuated her appeal.

The producers tried to find that in another 'Chrissy' but too much of Chrissy lied within Suzanne. Suzanne was the heart of the character and the producers thought that by putting in another blonde and writing her jokes, they could create a suitable substitute for Chrissy. It didn't happen. I know people like to trumpet about Suzanne's greed & arrogance, but this was clearly a case of the producers thinking too much of themselves. They were clearly arrogant thinking they could create another 'Chrissy' with any new face that stepped into the role.

Why it worked with Priscilla Barnes' Terri is because Jack & Terri weren't as close, especially in the beginning. They did indeed care for each other, but they were not nearly as 'brother-sister' as Jack was with Chrissy & Cindy. There was a bit of tension with Terri & Jack, which was minimal but it needed to be there for it to not be 'icky' when Jack would make advance comments towards her. Otherwise, there'd be a sense of incest going on if that underlying tension didn't exist. Jack & Terri did care for and love each other, but it was more friendly love, not family love. I'm not sure if the producers sensed this and arranged for this to happen or if it was just a lucky accident, but it worked nonetheless.

There you have it...

Ed
__________________
save water... shower with a friend...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2005, 01:06 PM   #12
Number 9 Dream
Senior Member
That '70s Girl
 
Number 9 Dream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,859
Default

I like your explanation about this. It actually makes a lot of sense to me now that you worded it this way. I don't think anyone(*coughtheproducers*) should assume that a great character could be replaced like that- the magic is gone and there's no sense in trying to relive it. I'm actually glad they brought Terri in when they did(same with Cindy, although she's not my favorite blonde roomate) because the show needed a pick me up. It's the same principle with the landlords- as much as I love the Ropers, their sexual jokes were getting stale and the show needed a boost. I think Three's Company was so successful because each character brought a different aspect to the show and once it was getting old(the jokes and repetoires) it was changed around(not by choice but it happened). Overall, what I mean to say, is I love all the characters and I'm glad they stuck around as long as they did


Quote:
Originally Posted by Edster2973
Actually, Jack & Cindy were believable as friends... too believable actually. The producers felt that the sexual innuendo and the 'will they, or won't they' aspect of the show had diminished with the addition of Cindy since she was too much like a sister. Cindy Snow was not the kind of character to tell sex jokes or to have sex jokes revolve around; it would've come off as false. She was innocent like Chrissy but no way near as naive.

Janet Wood was more accessible in that area, but her role of putting off Jack's advances, in particular when it came to him and Chrissy, was far too ingrained in the audience's consciousness for that to be enough to carry the show. She did play a part in it, but it wasn't nearly enough. Again, Janet wasn't naive and could smell more than half of the advances that came her way.

Chrissy was brilliant in this aspect since her sexiness, and the innuendo that came with it, revolved around her without her even being aware of it. She was truly unaware of how she looked and didn't think she was all that, which further accentuated her appeal.

The producers tried to find that in another 'Chrissy' but too much of Chrissy lied within Suzanne. Suzanne was the heart of the character and the producers thought that by putting in another blonde and writing her jokes, they could create a suitable substitute for Chrissy. It didn't happen. I know people like to trumpet about Suzanne's greed & arrogance, but this was clearly a case of the producers thinking too much of themselves. They were clearly arrogant thinking they could create another 'Chrissy' with any new face that stepped into the role.

Why it worked with Priscilla Barnes' Terri is because Jack & Terri weren't as close, especially in the beginning. They did indeed care for each other, but they were not nearly as 'brother-sister' as Jack was with Chrissy & Cindy. There was a bit of tension with Terri & Jack, which was minimal but it needed to be there for it to not be 'icky' when Jack would make advance comments towards her. Otherwise, there'd be a sense of incest going on if that underlying tension didn't exist. Jack & Terri did care for and love each other, but it was more friendly love, not family love. I'm not sure if the producers sensed this and arranged for this to happen or if it was just a lucky accident, but it worked nonetheless.

There you have it...

Ed
__________________




Live a little
be a gypsy
get around



http://www.librarything.com/profile/skelterhelter

http://retrogirl82.dvdaf.com/owned


formerly Retrogirl82
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2005, 05:21 PM   #13
MoonFlower
Forum Regular
Member
 
MoonFlower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edster2973
Actually, Jack & Cindy were believable as friends... too believable actually. The producers felt that the sexual innuendo and the 'will they, or won't they' aspect of the show had diminished with the addition of Cindy since she was too much like a sister. Cindy Snow was not the kind of character to tell sex jokes or to have sex jokes revolve around; it would've come off as false. She was innocent like Chrissy but no way near as naive.

Janet Wood was more accessible in that area, but her role of putting off Jack's advances, in particular when it came to him and Chrissy, was far too ingrained in the audience's consciousness for that to be enough to carry the show. She did play a part in it, but it wasn't nearly enough. Again, Janet wasn't naive and could smell more than half of the advances that came her way.

Chrissy was brilliant in this aspect since her sexiness, and the innuendo that came with it, revolved around her without her even being aware of it. She was truly unaware of how she looked and didn't think she was all that, which further accentuated her appeal.

The producers tried to find that in another 'Chrissy' but too much of Chrissy lied within Suzanne. Suzanne was the heart of the character and the producers thought that by putting in another blonde and writing her jokes, they could create a suitable substitute for Chrissy. It didn't happen. I know people like to trumpet about Suzanne's greed & arrogance, but this was clearly a case of the producers thinking too much of themselves. They were clearly arrogant thinking they could create another 'Chrissy' with any new face that stepped into the role.

Why it worked with Priscilla Barnes' Terri is because Jack & Terri weren't as close, especially in the beginning. They did indeed care for each other, but they were not nearly as 'brother-sister' as Jack was with Chrissy & Cindy. There was a bit of tension with Terri & Jack, which was minimal but it needed to be there for it to not be 'icky' when Jack would make advance comments towards her. Otherwise, there'd be a sense of incest going on if that underlying tension didn't exist. Jack & Terri did care for and love each other, but it was more friendly love, not family love. I'm not sure if the producers sensed this and arranged for this to happen or if it was just a lucky accident, but it worked nonetheless.

There you have it...

Ed

Why r ur postings always so long?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2005, 06:03 PM   #14
Edster2973
Forum Regular
Member
 
Edster2973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 19, 2003
Location: Somerset, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~*~ I Love TC ~*~
Why r ur postings always so long?

Excuse me, but my posts aren't that long. Ever read a book?

Still, if you're being serious, all I can say is if you don't like them, then don't read them. I was offering some insight and I think it had value. Much more intelligent than some of the posts here that consist of spelling the word 'are' as 'r' and the word 'your' as 'ur'. Sorry, but that smacks of laziness. No wonder we americans appear to be the lowest in education world-wide. We look dumber and dumber as time goes on.

I'd write more but I wouldn't want to be 'too long'...

Ed
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2005, 06:33 PM   #15
MoonFlower
Forum Regular
Member
 
MoonFlower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edster2973
Excuse me, but my posts aren't that long. Ever read a book?

Still, if you're being serious, all I can say is if you don't like them, then don't read them. I was offering some insight and I think it had value. Much more intelligent than some of the posts here that consist of spelling the word 'are' as 'r' and the word 'your' as 'ur'. Sorry, but that smacks of laziness. No wonder we americans appear to be the lowest in education world-wide. We look dumber and dumber as time goes on.

I'd write more but I wouldn't want to be 'too long'...

Ed

OK. cool, much better.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Although the administrators and moderators of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message. The owners of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.5.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.