Sal
09-25-2003, 05:46 PM
A few months ago, I replied to a thread where TV fans were asked to name their top 50 sitcoms of all time, an exercise which I heartily enjoyed. As I looked at what other people picked as their favorites, I noticed some fairly obvious personal biases where everyone was drawn to certain sitcoms by following a specific pattern. Some were drawn to the older classic shows like "I Love Lucy" or "Dick Van Dyke" while others preferred the modern classics like "Cheers" and "Friends", with no 2 people having similar tastes. When I looked at my list again, I wondered how many of my favorites would also show up on similar lists drawn up by TV critics and other so-called 'experts', people whose jobs revolve around watching TV all day and having to write about it for such respected publications like TV Guide and Entertainment Weekly, and Internet web sites like this one or The Futon Critic.
Just to refresh your memory, here are the shows that TV Guide picked:
http://www.ez-entertainment.net/features/tvguide50.htm
Now take a good look at that list and count how many of your favorite shows made the cut. I counted 23 out of my own top 50, which was better than I expected.
So then I wondered how I could make a similar Top 50 list without accounting for personal taste, being influenced by my head rather than my heart. So what I did was to go through more than 100 different sitcoms from the 1950s to the present, (the final total was 127) from "Burns and Allen" to "Malcolm In The Middle" and I ranked each one according to certain criteria which I will explain below.
PART 1---LONGEVITY
It naturally follows that the longer a sitcom keeps airing in prime time, the better it is. This doesn't quite apply to all cases, but it's a good way to start. I made note of how many seasons each series lasted and how many episodes originally aired and I came up with the following formula:
Number of Seasons X 10 + number of episodes
Example: "Happy Days":11 seasons X 10 + 255 episodes = 365 points
STEP 2---NIELSEN RATINGS
Another assumption that can easily be made is that the more viewers that a sitcom attracts and the more popular it becomes, which is reflected in the weekly and yearly Nielsen ratings, the better it is. This method appears to work better than Step 1 because it accurately measures a sitcom's hold on the viewing public from year to year. I looked through the yearly Nielsen ratings from 1950-2003 and checked off each sitcom that finished in the top 20 for each year and gave them points in reverse order based on order of finish. This means that the #1 show received 20 points, #2 gets 19 points, #3 gets 18 points, and so on up to #20 who ends up with 1 point.
STEP 3---EMMY AWARD WINNERS
Whatever your reservations about the Emmy Awards might be---the telecast is too long, boring, unfunny, etc. and the same shows seem to win every year (all valid points)---there is no denying that winning an Emmy is the highest honor that anyone involved with television can win. Knowing this, I gave each sitcom a big 25 points for every Emmy they've won. If you think that's too high let me know and I can change it to a lower number like 20 or 15, in the interest of maintaining fairness and accuracy.
STEP 4---JUMP THE SHARK
The final step involves a method which would allow me to take away points rather than add any more. This would involve finding a sitcom's weaknesses to balance their strengths, which were evaluated in the first 3 steps. No website does a better job of exploiting these weaknesses than "Jump The Shark". Once again, it is the viewers who decide how good or bad a particular sitcom is and they're never short of opinions either way. With the help of various episode guides, I would look up the precise point at which each show 'jumped' and used that point to reduce the total score. In other words, if a sitcom aired 200 episodes and it was determined to have jumped at around Episode #150, then it would lose 50 points. If a sitcom was a Day 1 jumper, then the total number of episodes would be subtracted from the score. If a sitcom never jumped at all, then no points would be added or subtracted. This greatly benefitted series like "The Simpsons" and "Cheers" and hurt others like Day 1 jumpers "Full House", "Who's The Boss?", and "Ozzie and Harriet", which lost a whopping 435 points, keeping it from a certain spot in the Top 20.
FINAL TOTAL: Step 1 + Step 2 + Step 3 - Step 4
Now that I've explained the process, it's time to salute our winners and here they are:
1. Cheers
2. Frasier
3. The Simpsons
4. The Mary Tyler Moore Show
5. All In The Family
6. MASH
7. Murphy Brown
8. Make Room For Daddy/The Danny Thomas Show
9. The Dick Van Dyke Show
10. Friends
11. The Golden Girls
12. Seinfeld
13. Everybody Loves Raymond
14. Home Improvement
15. My Three Sons
16. The Andy Griffith Show
17. Roseanne
18. Mad About You
19. The Cosby Show
20. Night Court
21. I Love Lucy
22. The Jeffersons
23. The Beverly Hillbillies
24. Will and Grace
25. Father Knows Best
26. Family Ties
27. 3rd Rock From The Sun
28. Bewitched
29. Get Smart
30. The Phil Silvers Show/Sgt. Bilko
31. The Donna Reed Show
32. The Real McCoys
33. The George Burns and Gracie Allen Show
34. Happy Days
35. The Drew Carey Show
36. Empty Nest
37. Hogan's Heroes
38. The Lucy Show
39. Newhart
40. Barney Miller
41. Three's Company
42. Maude
43. Coach
44. Sanford and Son
45. Laverne and Shirley
46. Hazel
47. A Different World
48. Malcolm In the Middle
49. Here's Lucy
50. The Wonder Years
Congratulations to all the winners!
If anyone knows a better way to do this, I'd love to hear about it!
Just to refresh your memory, here are the shows that TV Guide picked:
http://www.ez-entertainment.net/features/tvguide50.htm
Now take a good look at that list and count how many of your favorite shows made the cut. I counted 23 out of my own top 50, which was better than I expected.
So then I wondered how I could make a similar Top 50 list without accounting for personal taste, being influenced by my head rather than my heart. So what I did was to go through more than 100 different sitcoms from the 1950s to the present, (the final total was 127) from "Burns and Allen" to "Malcolm In The Middle" and I ranked each one according to certain criteria which I will explain below.
PART 1---LONGEVITY
It naturally follows that the longer a sitcom keeps airing in prime time, the better it is. This doesn't quite apply to all cases, but it's a good way to start. I made note of how many seasons each series lasted and how many episodes originally aired and I came up with the following formula:
Number of Seasons X 10 + number of episodes
Example: "Happy Days":11 seasons X 10 + 255 episodes = 365 points
STEP 2---NIELSEN RATINGS
Another assumption that can easily be made is that the more viewers that a sitcom attracts and the more popular it becomes, which is reflected in the weekly and yearly Nielsen ratings, the better it is. This method appears to work better than Step 1 because it accurately measures a sitcom's hold on the viewing public from year to year. I looked through the yearly Nielsen ratings from 1950-2003 and checked off each sitcom that finished in the top 20 for each year and gave them points in reverse order based on order of finish. This means that the #1 show received 20 points, #2 gets 19 points, #3 gets 18 points, and so on up to #20 who ends up with 1 point.
STEP 3---EMMY AWARD WINNERS
Whatever your reservations about the Emmy Awards might be---the telecast is too long, boring, unfunny, etc. and the same shows seem to win every year (all valid points)---there is no denying that winning an Emmy is the highest honor that anyone involved with television can win. Knowing this, I gave each sitcom a big 25 points for every Emmy they've won. If you think that's too high let me know and I can change it to a lower number like 20 or 15, in the interest of maintaining fairness and accuracy.
STEP 4---JUMP THE SHARK
The final step involves a method which would allow me to take away points rather than add any more. This would involve finding a sitcom's weaknesses to balance their strengths, which were evaluated in the first 3 steps. No website does a better job of exploiting these weaknesses than "Jump The Shark". Once again, it is the viewers who decide how good or bad a particular sitcom is and they're never short of opinions either way. With the help of various episode guides, I would look up the precise point at which each show 'jumped' and used that point to reduce the total score. In other words, if a sitcom aired 200 episodes and it was determined to have jumped at around Episode #150, then it would lose 50 points. If a sitcom was a Day 1 jumper, then the total number of episodes would be subtracted from the score. If a sitcom never jumped at all, then no points would be added or subtracted. This greatly benefitted series like "The Simpsons" and "Cheers" and hurt others like Day 1 jumpers "Full House", "Who's The Boss?", and "Ozzie and Harriet", which lost a whopping 435 points, keeping it from a certain spot in the Top 20.
FINAL TOTAL: Step 1 + Step 2 + Step 3 - Step 4
Now that I've explained the process, it's time to salute our winners and here they are:
1. Cheers
2. Frasier
3. The Simpsons
4. The Mary Tyler Moore Show
5. All In The Family
6. MASH
7. Murphy Brown
8. Make Room For Daddy/The Danny Thomas Show
9. The Dick Van Dyke Show
10. Friends
11. The Golden Girls
12. Seinfeld
13. Everybody Loves Raymond
14. Home Improvement
15. My Three Sons
16. The Andy Griffith Show
17. Roseanne
18. Mad About You
19. The Cosby Show
20. Night Court
21. I Love Lucy
22. The Jeffersons
23. The Beverly Hillbillies
24. Will and Grace
25. Father Knows Best
26. Family Ties
27. 3rd Rock From The Sun
28. Bewitched
29. Get Smart
30. The Phil Silvers Show/Sgt. Bilko
31. The Donna Reed Show
32. The Real McCoys
33. The George Burns and Gracie Allen Show
34. Happy Days
35. The Drew Carey Show
36. Empty Nest
37. Hogan's Heroes
38. The Lucy Show
39. Newhart
40. Barney Miller
41. Three's Company
42. Maude
43. Coach
44. Sanford and Son
45. Laverne and Shirley
46. Hazel
47. A Different World
48. Malcolm In the Middle
49. Here's Lucy
50. The Wonder Years
Congratulations to all the winners!
If anyone knows a better way to do this, I'd love to hear about it!