PDA

View Full Version : Blair in the Reunion

Fender106
08-01-2002, 02:50 PM
I taped the reunion when it aired, so I watched it again today, and I noticed something. During the reunion, Blair was acting richer than she had been acting during the end of the FOL show. During the show she would wear casual dresses, etc, and during the reunion she wore feathers on her clothes like she was a millionare (she may have been, lol). Did she get richer? Because she seemed more casual during the end of the series then she did in the reunion. Did anyone else notice this?


BTW, don't you love the alien in my new signature? LOL :lol:
BonniesLilCutiePie
08-01-2002, 03:59 PM
Yeah! I think that she did. Because, she married Tad, and he was rich too. I love that name! Blair Warner - Warner :D :D :D
Impressions
08-01-2002, 04:46 PM
Yes Blair is very wealthy, and she now has built her own hotel empire with her new husband Tad.
Mr. Stefani
08-01-2002, 08:40 PM
"Blair" was very badly written.
ks
08-01-2002, 08:50 PM
Originally posted by timmy087
"Blair" was very badly written.


I agree. That was so not the Blair I know. Some people could argue it's because Jo wasn't there for her to argue with, but the writers still could have done a much better job. They didn't do Blair Warner justice in the reunion movie.






ks
DarleneIllyria
08-01-2002, 10:46 PM
Originally posted by ks



I agree. That was so not the Blair I know. Some people could argue it's because Jo wasn't there for her to argue with, but the writers still could have done a much better job. They didn't do Blair Warner justice in the reunion movie.






ks

I wasn't going to say anything because I like Blair on the tv show and I like Lisa too, but the Blair from the reunion was different from the Blair on the tv show. I think a piece of it was because you didn't have Blair and Jo trading insults to each other. I'm glad they didn't do a total opposite Blair character and have Blair turn into a total saint.

Just wondering but were the writers for the reunion the same writers from the show?
Fender106
08-01-2002, 11:03 PM
Originally posted by ks



I agree. That was so not the Blair I know. Some people could argue it's because Jo wasn't there for her to argue with, but the writers still could have done a much better job. They didn't do Blair Warner justice in the reunion movie.






ks

I totally agree. Blair matured during the end of the series, and in the reunion it seemed like she was acting just like she was in seasons 1-3.
iluvjoandnancy4eva
08-01-2002, 11:22 PM
well..um the reunion pretty much sucked anyway. when tootie said "didn't you watch our show?" to somebody it totally ruined the whole thing for me. it really pissed me off.
btw.. other people have that banner thing in their profile.. i want one.. i made one haha and im gonna put it in there.
ks
08-01-2002, 11:35 PM
Originally posted by Jenny

Just wondering but were the writers for the reunion the same writers from the show?


I don't believe so. I read somewhere that the writer's researched the show a lot watching episodes and what not, but in my opinion they didn't research it quite enough. They should have consulted the fans in the making of it!;)


I agree with whoever said that about Tootie's quote. I didn't catch it the first time, but when I went back and rewatched it I did and that was kinda...odd.






ks
iluvjoandnancy4eva
08-01-2002, 11:48 PM
thank you KS! i dont really understand WHY they put that in there. AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!:mad:
Warm & Fuzzy
08-02-2002, 01:37 PM
Originally posted by ks



I don't believe so. I read somewhere that the writer's researched the show a lot watching episodes and what not, but in my opinion they didn't research it quite enough. They should have consulted the fans in the making of it!;)







ks Of course! :)

BTW, here are some old screen caps, lol...

http://www.geocities.com/bluemountain318/frame.html
Mr. Stefani
08-02-2002, 03:29 PM
The org. writers said they didn't want any part of the fol reunion movie. It probably would of been a lot better with them.
BonniesLilCutiePie
08-02-2002, 05:16 PM
Originally posted by timmy087
The org. writers said they didn't want any part of the fol reunion movie. It probably would of been a lot better with them.

I agree! It would be better with the original writers.
DarleneIllyria
08-02-2002, 08:55 PM
Maybe we should all think about it as a 'Then' and 'Now' thing. The plot to the movie was a bit flimsy, but maybe we are all looking at it the wrong way. Maybe we should just be happy that we got to have the reunion and see what Blair, Nat, and Tootie were up to in the year 2001.

Most reunion movies have that flimsy plot, but its just cool to relive it all and see the characters again in a new story line. I'm disappointed that Nancy wasn't in it, but I'm cool with her not being in it. I'm sure Nancy has had to take all kinds of opposite Jo roles in order to get out of the typecasting box.

jmo..
MrsGarrettRocksMySocks
08-02-2002, 11:02 PM
no offense, BUT, I've read fan FICTIONS that were better than the reunion...although I did like it.I dunno...to me, Blair did seem a LITTLE more........"Blair-ish" than usual, but hey...w/e floats their boat...JMO...


Mrs. G was....not Mrs. G either...I mean, yea, she had her moments...but...she was...different...moronic writers...


also, I agree, they didn't research enough, did ya notice how when Blair was telling Sam and Jamie about Geri coming she said she was "embarrassed" of Geri....NO SHE WASN'T!!!!!!! SHE WAS JJJJJEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAALLLLOOOOOUUUUUUUSSSSS!!! They even said so like three billion times in the episode...lol..okay, so it was more like TWO times, but still...how do you research and still make a mistake like that??DUHNESS!!!!!CAPTAIN OBVIOUS!!!