Clinton defends bin Laden efforts

[ABlairican Pie]

MSNBC.com

Ex-President Clinton defends bin Laden efforts
In interview, Clinton says he ‘worked hard’ to deal with al-Qaida leader
The Associated Press

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/060924/060924_clinton_hmed_11a.hmedium.jpg
In this handout photo provided by Fox News Sunday, former President Bill Clinton responds to host Chris Wallace during a taping of an interview for "Fox News Sunday" on Friday.



Updated: 11:50 a.m. PT Sept 24, 2006
NEW YORK - In a combative interview on “Fox News Sunday,” former President Clinton defended his handling of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden, saying he tried to have bin Laden killed and was attacked for his efforts by the same people who now criticize him for not doing enough.

“That’s the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now,” Clinton said in the interview. “They ridiculed me for trying. They had eight months to try, they did not try.”

Clinton accused host Chris Wallace of a “conservative hit job” and asked: “I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked, ‘Why didn’t you do anything about the Cole?’ I want to know how many people you asked, ‘Why did you fire Dick Clarke?’”

He was referring to the USS Cole, attacked by terrorists in Yemen in 2000, and former White House anti-terrorism chief Richard A. Clarke.

Wallace said Sunday he was surprised by Clinton’s “conspiratorial view” of “a very non-confrontational question, ‘Did you do enough to connect the dots and go after Al Qaida?”’

“All I did was ask him a question, and I think it was a legitimate news question. I was surprised that he would conjure up that this was a hit job,” Wallace said in a telephone interview.

Clinton said he “worked hard” to try to kill bin Laden.


“We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody’s gotten since,” he said.

He told Wallace, “And you got that little smirk on your face and you think you’re so clever, but I had responsibility for trying to protect this country. I tried and I failed to get bin Laden. I regret it, but I did try and I did everything I thought I responsibly could.”

The interview was taped Friday during Clinton’s three-day Global Initiative conference.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

[Janice]

Clinton came off as thin-skinned, paranoid, overly defensive and angry. He made a fool out of himself over a simple question. Claims he was set up. He's probably still pissed about the movie, The Path To 9/11.

He rambled on and on, repeating himself. Richard Clarke, Richard Clarke, Richard Clarke!!

He seems obsessed with his legacy. Only natural I guess, considering all the scandals and his impeachment.

[Tweety]

For those of you out there who missed it, here's a portion of the transcript:


Wallace: Mr. President, why didn't you do more to try to get bin Laden?

Clinton: Waaaaaahhh! How come you're asking ME a question and you didn't ask Bush?? Waaaaahhhhh! Did you ask Rumsfeld? Waaaaaahhh! How come you're asking ME that question It's not faaaaiiiirr!!! waaaahhhh! I want my momieeeee! waaaahhhh! It's not faaaaiiiirr!!! It's a vast right-wing conspiracy!!! waaaaahhhhh!! I want MY MOMIEEEEEEE!!!!


That'll give you some idea of the tone.

[Janice]

For those of you out there who missed it, here's a portion of the transcript:


Wallace: Mr. President, why didn't you do more to try to get bin Laden?

Clinton: Waaaaaahhh! How come you're asking ME a question and you didn't ask Bush?? Waaaaahhhhh! Did you ask Rumsfeld? Waaaaaahhh! How come you're asking ME that question It's not faaaaiiiirr!!! waaaahhhh! I want my momieeeee! waaaahhhh! It's not faaaaiiiirr!!! It's a vast right-wing conspiracy!!! waaaaahhhhh!! I want MY MOMIEEEEEEE!!!!


That'll give you some idea of the tone.
:brent

Don't forget Clinton saying to Wallace, "You got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever."

Chris Wallace looked at him like Oprah looked at Tom Cruise when he was jumping on her sofa.

[James"Thunder"Early]

Video of some of the exchange http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74eCv9Q6Oy4

He finally fights back against the false charges and the accusers don't like it, unbelievable. It's about time he fought back.

[Tweety]

Video of some of the exchange http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74eCv9Q6Oy4

He finally fights back against the false charges and the accusers don't like it, unbelievable. It's about time he fought back.

FINALLY fights back?? From the Democrats' point of view, the whole purpose of the 9/11 commission was to absolve Clinton of any blame for terrorism... why do you think the Democrats just HAPPENED to select Jamie Gorelick to be on the Commission, when she should have been called as a witness, as she's the one who built 'the Wall'?

Democrats began their campaign to absolve Clinton on 9/12/01.

[Tweety]

:brent

Don't forget Clinton saying to Wallace, "You got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever."

Chris Wallace looked at him like Oprah looked at Tom Cruise when he was jumping on her sofa.


I expected Clinton to follow that up with nyea nyea nyea nyea nyea neyahhh!

Yes, that was hysterical! Can you imagine Bush saying that to a reporter?
Reading Clinton's words, it's sometimes hard to believe that he was actually the President of the United States for eight years! My, how well he expresses himself!

[James"Thunder"Early]

FINALLY fights back?? From the Democrats' point of view, the whole purpose of the 9/11 commission was to absolve Clinton of any blame for terrorism... why do you think the Democrats just HAPPENED to select Jamie Gorelick to be on the Commission, when she should have been called as a witness, as she's the one who built 'the Wall'?

Democrats began their campaign to absolve Clinton on 9/12/01.No Democrat has said a word to combat the false charges hurled against Clinton by Republicans. The 9/11 commission was to find out what happened before the attack, not to absolve anyone.

[Tweety]

No Democrat has said a word to combat the false charges hurled against Clinton by Republicans. The 9/11 commission was to find out what happened before the attack, not to absolve anyone.

So I guess (Clinton National Security Advisor) Sandy Burger sneaking documents out of the national archives by stuffing them down his pants was the Clinton Administrations way of "getting to the truth"?

[Dr. John Becker]

Video of some of the exchange http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74eCv9Q6Oy4

He finally fights back against the false charges and the accusers don't like it, unbelievable. It's about time he fought back.

False charges? Wallace asked a simple question and a fair question.

[Dr. John Becker]

No Democrat has said a word to combat the false charges hurled against Clinton by Republicans. The 9/11 commission was to find out what happened before the attack, not to absolve anyone.

Please name these false charges. Anytime someone says anything about Clinton that isn't favorable to his "legacy" it's automatically labled a "right wing attack"

[Dr. John Becker]

So I guess (Clinton National Security Advisor) Sandy Burger sneaking documents out of the national archives by stuffing them down his pants was the Clinton Administrations way of "getting to the truth"?
:lol:

[ABlairican Pie]

How is it that Clinton "didn't do anything" about hitting bin Laden and al Qaeda when he tried to strike two targets where he thought he was hiding in the Middle East, and the Republicans accused him of "wagging the dog" to divert attention from his impeachment woes? :confused:

[Dr. John Becker]

How is it that Clinton "didn't do anything" about hitting bin Laden and al Qaeda when he tried to strike two targets where he thought he was hiding in the Middle East, and the Republicans accused him of "wagging the dog" to divert attention from his impeachment woes? :confused:

Probably because of all the years Clinton had to do something, he chose the eve of his impeachment to start bombing.

[James"Thunder"Early]

How is it that Clinton "didn't do anything" about hitting bin Laden and al Qaeda when he tried to strike two targets where he thought he was hiding in the Middle East, and the Republicans accused him of "wagging the dog" to divert attention from his impeachment woes? :confused:You know, that's a good point. Republicans still criticize Clinton for doing that.

[Janice]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v642/FReeptheRats/ClintonMonica11.jpg (http://photobucket.com/)

[James"Thunder"Early]

False charges? Wallace asked a simple question and a fair question.The interviewer brought the false perception up by asking that question.

Please name these false charges. Anytime someone says anything about Clinton that isn't favorable to his "legacy" it's automatically labled a "right wing attack"The false charge that he didn't do anything about terrorism. He tried to pass a terrorism bill, but Trent Lott blocked it and said terrorism was a non-issue.

[Fleet]

You know, that's a good point. Republicans still criticize Clinton for doing that.
For good reason. Clinton did order bombings to divert attention away from his *many* scandals.

A former employee under Clinton when he was governor was on radio shows and would give advance warning when Clinton was about to order another attack. His warnings were usually accurate.

[Fleet]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v642/FReeptheRats/ClintonMonica11.jpg (http://photobucket.com/)
Well, you couldn't really blame him... that pizza does like kind of tempting. ;)

[James"Thunder"Early]

For good reason. Clinton did order bombings to divert attention away from his *many* scandals.No, they were ordered because Bin Laden was a threat.

[Fleet]

No, they were ordered because Bin Laden was a threat.
Then why were they always done just before some kind of court hearing or when some other scandal was brought before the courts.
Only you and other liberals would believe what you just typed.
And if Clinton really believed that Bin Laden was a threat, why didn't he accept the offers to take him into custody.
(And let's not get into the myth that BL was never offered to Clinton... he has admitted it on tape: "I didn't take him because he broke no U.S. laws at the time.")

[Jenya]

Well it looks like Bin Laden is pretty smart. He knows now that he will never be caught or tried by the U.S for his 9/11 crimes.

[ABlairican Pie]

Does anyone consider that maybe bin Laden and them were aware of what Clinton was going through politically, and took advantage of it? It was at that time bin Laden was conducting terrorist hits in East Africa and elsewhere.

[Fleet]

Well it looks like Bin Laden is pretty smart. He knows now that he will never be caught or tried by the U.S for his 9/11 crimes.
He still may be caught. You can never tell. Many people thought that Saddam would never have been captured.

[bossradio93]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060925/ap_on_re_us/clinton_fox_news (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060925/ap_on_re_us/clinton_fox_news)

Clinton, Fox anchor battle in interview

By KAREN MATTHEWS, Associated Press Writer

1 hour, 45 minutes ago

NEW YORK - In a combative interview on "Fox News Sunday," former President Clinton defended his handling of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden, saying he tried to have bin Laden killed and was attacked for his efforts by the same people who now criticize him for not doing enough.

"That's the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now," Clinton said in the interview. "They ridiculed me for trying. They had eight months to try, they did not try."

Clinton accused host Chris Wallace of a "conservative hit job" and asked: "I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked, 'Why didn't you do anything about the Cole?' I want to know how many people you asked, 'Why did you fire Dick Clarke?'"

He was referring to the USS Cole, attacked by terrorists in Yemen in 2000, and former White House anti-terrorism chief Richard A. Clarke.

Wallace said Sunday he was surprised by Clinton's "conspiratorial view" of "a very non-confrontational question, 'Did you do enough to connect the dots and go after Al Qaida?'"

"All I did was ask him a question, and I think it was a legitimate news question. I was surprised that he would conjure up that this was a hit job," Wallace said in a telephone interview.

Clinton said he "worked hard" to try to kill bin Laden.

"We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody's gotten since," he said.

He told Wallace, "And you got that little smirk on your face and you think you're so clever, but I had responsibility for trying to protect this country. I tried and I failed to get bin Laden. I regret it, but I did try and I did everything I thought I responsibly could."

The interview was taped Friday during Clinton's three-day Global Initiative conference.

On NBC's "Meet the Press," also taped Friday and aired Sunday, Clinton told interviewer Tim Russert that the biggest problem confronting the world today is "the illusion that our differences matter more than our common humanity."

"That's what's driving the terrorism," he said. "It's not just that there's an unresolved Arab-Israeli conflict. Osama Bin Laden and Dr. al-Zawahiri can convince young Sunni Arab men, who have — and some women — who have despairing conditions in their lives, that they get a one-way ticket to heaven in a hurry if they kill a lot of innocent people who don't share their reality."

Yahoo! News/AP-September 24, 2006



Since when did Chris Wallace became a 'right-wing whacko' all of a sudden? :eek:

[ABlairican Pie]

Well, you couldn't really blame him... that pizza does like kind of tempting. ;)I'm tempted. Does she deliver in 15 minutes or less?
;) :eat:

Throw in six-pack of Miller Lites and we got a date. :D :cheers:

[Tweety]

The other part of Clinton's remarks that cracked me up was when he claimed that he "never criticized President Bush".... WTF?

That's ALL the hell he's done for the last five years, both at home and abroad!

from: http://www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Sept05/220905Clintons_Bushes.htm

Act Three, Scene Two: Clinton Criticizes Bush (Again)

Stage show rolls on with Katrina backdrop in tow

Steve Watson | September 22 2005

The Houston Chronicle reported that former President Bill Clinton, asked by President Bush to help raise money for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, offered harsh public criticism of the Bush administration's disaster-relief effort on Sunday, saying, "You can't have an emergency plan that works if it only affects middle-class people up."

Clinton's comments on the ABC News program This Week could prove awkward for the White House, given Bush's eagerness to involve his Democratic predecessor in a high-profile role to raise money for the hurricane's victims, the Chronicle reported.

So what was the Bush response to Clinton's "tirade"? "I still like him" Bush Snr responded.





From: http://hcgtv.com/item/1433

19 September 2005
Clinton criticizes Bush
Former US president Bill Clinton sharply criticised George W. Bush for the Iraq War and the handling of Hurricane Katrina, and voiced alarm at the swelling US budget deficit.

Breaking with tradition under which US presidents mute criticisms of their successors, Clinton said the Bush administration had decided to invade Iraq "virtually alone and before UN inspections were completed, with no real urgency, no evidence that there were weapons of mass destruction."

On Hurricane Katrina...blah blah blah






From: http://www.turnto10.com/news/4432231/detail.html


Clinton Criticizes Bush Energy Bill, Tax Policy At Brown Speech
Ex-President Was In Providence Friday

POSTED: 2:50 pm EDT April 29, 2005
UPDATED: 8:31 pm EDT April 29, 2005
PROVIDENCE -- Former President Clinton on Friday criticized the current administration's energy policy as "dumb economics," and blasted President Bush's tax policy as selfish.... blah blah blah




Clinton is unbelievable... he says something one day, and then, the next day, hey, he never said it!

[Tweety]

No, they were ordered because Bin Laden was a threat.

Did bin Laden ever have WMDs?

[Dr. John Becker]

Does anyone consider that maybe bin Laden and them were aware of what Clinton was going through politically, and took advantage of it? It was at that time bin Laden was conducting terrorist hits in East Africa and elsewhere.

That's a good point.

[Dr. John Becker]

The other part of Clinton's remarks that cracked me up was when he claimed that he "never criticized President Bush".... WTF?

That's ALL the hell he's done for the last five years, both at home and abroad!

from: http://www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Sept05/220905Clintons_Bushes.htm

Act Three, Scene Two: Clinton Criticizes Bush (Again)

Stage show rolls on with Katrina backdrop in tow

Steve Watson | September 22 2005

The Houston Chronicle reported that former President Bill Clinton, asked by President Bush to help raise money for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, offered harsh public criticism of the Bush administration's disaster-relief effort on Sunday, saying, "You can't have an emergency plan that works if it only affects middle-class people up."

Clinton's comments on the ABC News program This Week could prove awkward for the White House, given Bush's eagerness to involve his Democratic predecessor in a high-profile role to raise money for the hurricane's victims, the Chronicle reported.

So what was the Bush response to Clinton's "tirade"? "I still like him" Bush Snr responded.





From: http://hcgtv.com/item/1433

19 September 2005
Clinton criticizes Bush
Former US president Bill Clinton sharply criticised George W. Bush for the Iraq War and the handling of Hurricane Katrina, and voiced alarm at the swelling US budget deficit.

Breaking with tradition under which US presidents mute criticisms of their successors, Clinton said the Bush administration had decided to invade Iraq "virtually alone and before UN inspections were completed, with no real urgency, no evidence that there were weapons of mass destruction."

On Hurricane Katrina...blah blah blah






From: http://www.turnto10.com/news/4432231/detail.html


Clinton Criticizes Bush Energy Bill, Tax Policy At Brown Speech
Ex-President Was In Providence Friday

POSTED: 2:50 pm EDT April 29, 2005
UPDATED: 8:31 pm EDT April 29, 2005
PROVIDENCE -- Former President Clinton on Friday criticized the current administration's energy policy as "dumb economics," and blasted President Bush's tax policy as selfish.... blah blah blah




Clinton is unbelievable... he says something one day, and then, the next day, hey, he never said it!


Clinton lies so much he forgets from day to day what he says.

[Bobby F.]

I CAN"T WAIT TO HEAR RUSH LIMBAUGH TODAY!!!!!:D :D

Stay tuned for upcoming posts from Rush on this subject!!!!

[Janice]

I CAN"T WAIT TO HEAR RUSH LIMBAUGH TODAY!!!!!:D :D

Stay tuned for upcoming posts from Rush on this subject!!!!
My guess is that Rush will conclude what a lot of pundits are saying about the interview - that this was a pre-emptive strike on Clinton's part. He's making the rounds talking about the Global Initiative Project, and it was his way of putting other journalists on notice to -to DON'T GO THERE.

Clinton, and his supporters are acting as if he was ambushed by FOX, when it was the other way around. Chris Wallace is a mild-mannered journalist, but he asks tough questions of everyone. I watch his show every Sunday. Clinton's Deaniac moment was staged...red meat for the Left.

Clinton's used to softball questions, like the ones from Keith "Moonbat" Olberman and Timmy Russert from Meet The Press.

So Clinton plays the victim of FOX, which the lefties just love.

[Tweety]

I CAN"T WAIT TO HEAR RUSH LIMBAUGH TODAY!!!!!:D :D

Stay tuned for upcoming posts from Rush on this subject!!!!



Today's show will be awesome... Probably will become a "best of" show down the road...

We're exactly 63 minutes away...as...of....NOW!!!

[Dr. John Becker]

Today's show will be awesome... Probably will become a "best of" show down the road...

We're exactly 63 minutes away...as...of....NOW!!!

I have yardwork I have to do, but I'm taking a walkman so I can hear Rush. This show will be awesome.

[James"Thunder"Early]

Then why were they always done just before some kind of court hearing or when some other scandal was brought before the courts.
Only you and other liberals would believe what you just typed.
And if Clinton really believed that Bin Laden was a threat, why didn't he accept the offers to take him into custody.
(And let's not get into the myth that BL was never offered to Clinton... he has admitted it on tape: "I didn't take him because he broke no U.S. laws at the time.")I believe it because it's the truth. Back then the Republicans were calling terrorism a non-issue and dismissing it.

[James"Thunder"Early]

Did bin Laden ever have WMDs?Where did I ever say he had WMDs? And he didn't have to have WMDs to be a threat.

[Janice]

I believe it because it's the truth. Back then the Republicans were calling terrorism a non-issue and dismissing it.
Such as?

[James"Thunder"Early]

Such as?http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/30/clinton.terrorism/

[Dr. John Becker]

I believe it because it's the truth. Back then the Republicans were calling terrorism a non-issue and dismissing it.

Clinton and the truth. Those two just don't go together.;)

[Janice]

http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/30/clinton.terrorism/
Nice try Doc, but that doesn't prove your claim that Republicans were calling terrorism a non-issue and dismissing it.

[Janice]

Clinton and the truth. Those two just don't go together.;)
http://www.ducret.com/images/politics/Clinton_Liar_-_Daily_News.jpg

[James"Thunder"Early]

Clinton and the truth. Those two just don't go together.;)At least he never talked about aluminum tubes and uranium, like some people.

[Janice]

Orrin Hatch called one of the measures that could help track terrorists a phony issue, case closed.
You're twisting words to fit your argument. Bubba would be proud. :D

[James"Thunder"Early]

You're twisting words to fit your argument. Bubba would be proud. :DI didn't twist anything, Hatch really said that

[Janice]

I didn't twist anything, Hatch really said that
I know what he said. He disagreed with one provision in the legislation. Sort of like the libs carping about the terrorist surveillance program. A person can disagree with a portion of a bill.

To claim that means that "The Republicans were calling terrorism a non-issue and dismissing it" is not only stretching the truth, it's an out and out lie.

[bossradio93]

http://www.ducret.com/images/politics/Clinton_Liar_-_Daily_News.jpg


One already knows that front page photo comes from a Murdoch-owned newspaper, not from a left-wing publication. :lol:

[Janice]

One already knows that front page photo comes from a Murdoch-owned newspaper, not from a left-wing publication. :lol:
It doesn't make it any less true.

[Dr. John Becker]

At least he never talked about aluminum tubes and uranium, like some people.
The Democrats agreed with those claims about aluminum tubes and uraniuim, however.

[Tweety]

Where did I ever say he had WMDs? And he didn't have to have WMDs to be a threat.


Really? According to Democrats, Saddam was never a threat because he supposedly had no WMDs...THAT'S the very reason Democrats say that Saddam wasn't a threat!

So bin Laden can be a threat with or without WMDs, but Saddam can only be a threat if he actually has them? OK, now I get it...

[Tweety]

btw, Rush has already nuked Clinton's assertion that Republicans didn't support his trying to bomb bin Laden... Rush retrieved quotes from Newt Gingerich and Trent Lott (top Republican in the House and top Republican in the Senate at that time) who are on record as totally supporting Clinton in his actions... also quoted were Dan Quayle and a couple of other former high-ranking Republicans...

Republicans at that time believed that, even though a Democrat was occupying the White House, that the country should be united when attacked... unlike that party that's been in the minority since that time.

So much for yet another of Clinton's lies...

[Dr. John Becker]

Really? According to Democrats, Saddam was never a threat because he supposedly had no WMDs...THAT'S the very reason Democrats say that Saddam wasn't a threat!

So bin Laden can be a threat with or without WMDs, but Saddam can only be a threat if he actually has them? OK, now I get it...

Good point, Tweety

[James"Thunder"Early]

The Democrats agreed with those claims about aluminum tubes and uraniuim, however.Even if they did, that still doesn't mean they were true.

[Dr. John Becker]

Even if they did, that still doesn't mean they were true.

The point is, that Bush believed it and so did the Democrats. Bush didn't lie.

[Fleet]

The point is, that Bush believed it and so did the Democrats. Bush didn't lie.
It was according to British intelligence regarding the aluminum tubes and uranium. So, you're right... Bush didn't lie.

[James"Thunder"Early]

The point is, that Bush believed it and so did the Democrats. Bush didn't lie.He was warned about the validity uranium and aluminum tube claims, more than once, but he said it was true in the state of the union. That is lying.

[Bobby F.]

He was warned before that that, more than once, but he said it was true in the state of the union. That is lying.

Whaaatttt?????:confused: :confused:

The Clinton mess has got you speaking strangely, Doc.

[Tweety]

From Rush's show, Monday Sept 25, 2006

RUSH: I want to give you a contrast here of how Clinton is treated elsewhere in the media. We put together a montage of Larry King, Meredith Vieira at NBC, Greta Van Susteren, on Fox, Tim Russert, and another guy at MSNBC -- Keith Olbermann, all interviewing former President Clinton, just to contrast the treatment he has been used to for -- well, since 1992, the presidential campaign '93.

KING: Now, the purpose of your initiative, overall, is to make the world a better place, right? How's your health? Did you see the Al Gore movie?

VIEIRA: If you had a genie, what wish would you want granted? You have lots of intelligence. When the New York Times recently ran a front-page article about your marriage, do you think that was fair?

VAN SUSTEREN: How's your new best friend, President Bush 41?

RUSSERT: What do you think is the biggest problem confronting our world, the biggest?

OLBERMANN: This was transcendent, these last three days, the number of people that you reached here and the convictions and the generosity. Here's eight more schools in Kenya for me.

CLINTON: Oh thank you.

RUSH: "Thank you." (Laughing.) These people all live in their own little world. It's a circle.




Yeah, the rest of the media is REAL, REAL TOUGH on poor Bill. :(

[Dr. John Becker]

He was warned before that , more than once, but he said it was true in the state of the union. That is lying.

That post dosen't even make sense.:crazy:

[Fleet]

That post dosen't even make sense.:crazy:
That's for sure! :lol:

[Dr. John Becker]

He was warned about the validity uranium and aluminum tube claims, more than once, but he said it was true in the state of the union. That is lying.

Was Al Gore lying when he said this:"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

[Fleet]

Was Al Gore lying when he said this:"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
No, it's only a "lie" when a Republican says it.