PDA

View Full Version : King Kong Returns To Empire State Building


Janice
12-06-2005, 09:40 AM
King Kong Returns to Empire State Building


http://ak.imgfarm.com/images/ap/thumbnails//KING_KONG_PREMIERE.sff_NYHA115_20051205212037.jpg (http://apnews.excite.com/image/20051205/KING_KONG_PREMIERE.sff_NYHA115_20051205212037.html?date=20051206&docid=D8EAG72GA)
(AP) "King Kong" producer/writer-director Peter Jackson, second from left, holds a 1933 Stop Motion...
Full Image (http://apnews.excite.com/image/20051205/KING_KONG_PREMIERE.sff_NYHA115_20051205212037.html?date=20051206&docid=D8EAG72GA)

NEW YORK (AP) - Not surprisingly, considering New York's long-held fascination with the big gorilla, the city went ape for King Kong Monday.

The supersized simian has captivated New Yorkers since he first stepped foot, a giant one at that, in the city in 1933, via the classic RKO film. His building-scaling, blonde-loving ways made him an instant legend.

With the arrival Monday of the new $150 million cinematic version of the ape-meets-girl story, King Kong was once again the toast of the town.

Besides Mayor Bloomberg declaring Monday "King Kong Day," the hairy creature took a seat of honor in Times Square, growled from billboards throughout town and was the guest of honor at many parties. One of them was at the Empire State Building - the structure he famously climbed while carrying Fay Wray in the original movie.

"I always kind of felt there's like this twisted love relationship between King Kong and Fay Wray and the Empire State Building," said Lydia Ruth, the building's public relations director and special-events coordinator. "We made him famous or he made us famous. I'm not sure."

William Kornblum, a professor of sociology at The Graduate Center of City University of New York, said that despite being fiction, the movie did, in many ways, reflect history.

"The film used a building which symbolized the way the United States, and especially New York City, was reaching for the sky in its ambitions," said Kornblum, a New Yorker who specializes in urban history.

Richard Pena, program director of the Film Society of Lincoln Center, agreed.
"It seemed, in a way, one of architecture's noblest achievements and at the same time it was where this primitive ape climbed up," he said. "It was a symbol of modernity overtaken by the symbol of the primitive."

http://ak.imgfarm.com/images/ap/thumbnails//KING_KONG.sff_XSR209_20051205211244.jpg (http://apnews.excite.com/image/20051205/KING_KONG.sff_XSR209_20051205211244.html?date=20051206&docid=D8EAG72GA)
(AP) George Lucas poses for photographers at the world premiere of the film King Kong, New York, Monday,...
Full Image (http://apnews.excite.com/image/20051205/KING_KONG.sff_XSR209_20051205211244.html?date=20051206&docid=D8EAG72GA)

Part of the reason the King Kong legend had so much impact was that "it came out at the right time," said Ray Morton, author of "King Kong: The History of a Movie Icon." The film, he said, "was brand-new at the same time the Empire State Building was."

The 1976 remake of "King Kong," starring Jessica Lange, placed the ape atop the World Trade Center towers.

But the new rendition of the film, directed by Peter Jackson of "The Lord of the Rings" fame, takes the creature back to the Empire State Building, which, because of the tragic events of Sept. 11, is once again New York's tallest building.

At Times Square on Monday, a fake giant ape attracted hordes of crowds, including many tourists eager to take pictures with one of New York's most famous visitors.

"It's so cute! It's adorable," said Carol Kenner, 35, of Brooklyn.
Michael Zorek, 45, a stay-at-home dad, took his 3-year-old son, Jeremy, to check out the Times Square ape.

Jeremy told his father that "King Kong" didn't seem like a kids film. But as he looked at the hairy creature in front of him, Jeremy did not appear overly impressed.

Was it scary? "No," Jeremy said. "It's pretend."

Brian Damage
12-06-2005, 09:43 AM
I'm a little skeptical about this movie. The original Kong was a classic. Remakes usually never live up to the hype.

80sTrivia
12-06-2005, 03:20 PM
I've been looking forward to seeing this movie all summer! I hope it lives up to the expectations! :crazy:

TV DVD Fan
12-06-2005, 04:59 PM
I'm a little skeptical about this movie. The original Kong was a classic. Remakes usually never live up to the hype.


I definately agree with the latter, but I think this one's gonna be good, too, I've heard that they made the CGI effects so that every hair on Kong's body aligned perfectly with one another. I think it's gonna be kick-ass in SE's, the question is, how will the acting be? The definate good sign is it takes place in the 30s, like the original. Unlike a totally tasteless and unfunny remake like THE HONEYMOONERS (no offense, but Paramount did their best to make it the exact opposite of the show although I haven't seen it, nor do I intend to, the previews were enough for me, I mean, they talk about unclean subjects that as Chuck Woolery would say, the execs wouldn't "touch that one with a forklift", back in the 50s and they made sure the cast wasn't the same color, you cannot place an African-American in a Caucasian role, and vice versa, and especially not Cedric). I think I'll wait for the DVD, though, I ain't big on movie theatres, rather watch it from the comfort of home.


I hope no one takes offense to my comments, but I'm sure we all can agree that Paramount did that to diss the original.

Switches (except for George Costanza's cases), generally aren't a good thing from a TV show to a film, like switching a man's role to a woman's, black to white, white to black, etc.

Make-up is everything, if you try to switch the looks, you diss the creator.

ie, THE JEFFERSONS starring Tom Cruise?
ALL IN THE FAMILY starring Mike Epps?

Does that sound right to anyone? (Sorry to be long-winded, I just don't want to offend anyone here)


Anyway, Kong never interested me much, but lately with previews, previews, then more previews, and online reviews of the original Kong, I think I wanta give the KING a try. (As long as he promises not to place me atop the forthcoming Freedom Tower, which is expected to soar 1,800 feet in the air, yikes, Fay wouldn't be happy if the movie took place 10 years from now!)

Pat

TJL
12-06-2005, 05:16 PM
Am I the only one on the planet who liked the 1976 version?

LucyCompanyPhan
12-06-2005, 09:48 PM
Usually remakes aren't good but there are exceptions and with the technology, this is the remake we need. The original will always be the original and no one will ever for get it, but how about for adventure and action? Jackson is an incredible director who does the impossible with a camara. I have full faith that this will be the blockbuster of the year.

Karen*
12-06-2005, 11:19 PM
No offense, but the remake looks really stupid. It's like what they tried to do with Bewitched...not making an actual, full-out remake, but making a movie ABOUT making a remake, and everything becomes real as the actors create that remake. If that makes any sense to you guys. :p

Brad Russ
12-12-2005, 03:26 AM
I'm excited about this movie, it looks really good.

Karen*
12-12-2005, 04:34 PM
I changed my mind...I wanna see it now! :p

TJL
12-12-2005, 05:24 PM
I changed my mind...I wanna see it now! :p

According to all the advanced critical praise, this film is guaranteed to do everyting short of curing cancer, so you had better get in line right now.

;)

Karen*
12-13-2005, 01:15 AM
According to all the advanced critical praise, this film is guaranteed to do everyting short of curing cancer, so you had better get in line right now.

;)
Nah...I'll wait a week or two so I can get in for free. ;)

TV DVD Fan
12-13-2005, 08:24 PM
I never thought much of Kong, but I gotta admit, I am very tempted to start collecting all of the old films and see the new film. It is VERY hard for the critics to like a movie, and they are all over it, it sounds like a great love story, and I always like a little romance.


Pat

eltonfan80
12-13-2005, 09:04 PM
it true that is suppose to be a giant spider in the moive if so i not going to see cuase i am dealthly afraid of spiders

LucyCompanyPhan
12-13-2005, 11:04 PM
I just watched some of the original King Kong on TCM (1933) and I really loved what I saw from the original. Unfortantely I didn't get to see all of it, but I loved the technique and style. I could just picture what Jackson has in store. I'll probably wait until the following weekend to see this because there are some other movies I need to check out first.

Brad Russ
12-17-2005, 04:48 PM
Has anybody seen it yet?? Despite all the great reviews, it apparantely didn't do very well on it's opening day, making only about 8 million dollars.Considering the fact that this film costed over 200 million to make, and many people were predicting it would break Titanic's all time record, this is incredibly disappointing news. Hopefully it'll do better over the weekend, because this looks like a big budget hollywood film that is actually good for a change.

Zebra 3
12-17-2005, 10:39 PM
Am I the only one on the planet who liked the 1976 version?
I liked it when I saw it in the theatre, but it loses some of its charm on TV.

Karen*
12-18-2005, 03:31 AM
Last night, I met a lady who walked out of a screening of this movie. She said she thought it was too sad. o_0

LucyCompanyPhan
12-18-2005, 01:56 PM
King Kong opened with 50 million over the weekend. With the money it made on Wednesday and Thursday, its sitting at 66 million domestic. Narina opened with 67 million last week I think to compare. Narnia is sitting with 113 million right now.

ponytail
12-19-2005, 05:46 AM
It looks good, but I don't want to see it because I know how it ends. I'll end up crying.

Janice
12-24-2005, 11:17 AM
I saw King Kong yesterday, and it was a fantastic movie. The special effects were really something.

The only complaint I have is that the setup took way too long. It takes a good hour to get to the island and finally see Kong. The movie didn't have to be over three hours long, in my opinion.

My other complaint is the way they sort of turned it into Jurassic Park.

The ending is a tearjerker. The movie really should be seen in the theater.

LucyCompanyPhan
12-24-2005, 11:51 AM
I saw King Kong yesterday, and it was a fantastic movie. The special effects were really something.

The only complaint I have is that the setup took way too long. It takes a good hour to get to the island and finally see Kong. The movie didn't have to be over three hours long, in my opinion.

My other complaint is the way they sort of turned it into Jurassic Park.

The ending is a tearjerker. The movie really should be seen in the theater.


I agree with you about the setup to the island. I think if Jackson would have cut a few moments here and there and cut about 15-20 minutes it would have been perfect. Jackson tried to develop these characters that didn't need to be developed. For example did we really need that old man in the beginning who left for chicago? Or the whole Jimmy setup of stealing the pen and talking about that book. I just think there were a few things that should have been cut. The movie once they got on the island was perfect. I loved how we saw Kong right away.

I don't know what you mean by "it turned into Jurassic Park" just because yes there are dinosaurs in it, but there are dinosaurs in the original 1933 movie so its not like they were just thrown in there. Anyway those special effects were incredible.

The movie is very emotional and is definately a tearjeaker. I got very teary eyed and my mom was crying hysterically even before the ending!

Janice
12-24-2005, 12:00 PM
I don't know what you mean by "it turned into Jurassic Park" just because yes there are dinosaurs in it, but there are dinosaurs in the original 1933 movie so its not like they were just thrown in there. Anyway those special effects were incredible. !
I just think they overdid it with the dinosaurs. That scene when they were all running from the dinosaurs was incredible.

Personally, I think they could have cropped 45 minutes off the movie.

I also would have liked to see more of Kong in New York.

TV DVD Fan
12-30-2005, 05:06 PM
I finally saw it and it was incredible. So convincing that Kong really was willing to give up his life for Anne. I cried alot through the film, but the scene that really got me was the one where Anne says "enough". The look on his face immediately moved me to tears, and then the way he turned his back with his head down and walked away.

I barely could make it through the first 50 minutes. Come on, why do we need the business end of it? We came to see Kong, not some wiseass kid and some people that I wished Kong would kill on sight. If it started with a brief intro for the main cast, and proceeded right into Skull Island around 50 minutes and 0 seconds, I wouldn't complain. Those natives really freaked me out, man, they looked posessed. An overall perfect film, probably the best of all time as far as I'm concerned. Great job, Mr. Jackson. 2 hours would've been good enough, though.

The ending also really moved me, and boy was that a great catch or what when Kong caught Anne who was falling from the top of the Empire State Building?

I saw the '76 version the other night, too, and I really thought it was great. It was really hard to see the WTC again, though. Both movies had me moved to tears.

As far as I'm concerned, Peter Jackson's KONG was no horror picture, it was a story of love through the eyes of a disfigured and lonely individual who needed a friend and felt too much out of place. He just wanted to be normal, he just wanted to make a friend in Anne. He was really just an ordinary individual, who was ready to die for his true love. He could tell he was full of compassion and was really upset that he couldn't be normal no matter what he did, and he knew it. Animal instinct? No, it was something much deeper, much, much deeper.

Bravo, Mr. Jackson.

Central Perk
12-30-2005, 06:57 PM
I really enjoyed it, but I feel about 15-30 minutes could have been cut from the island. What really makes this movie more than just a blockbuster is defintely the performance of Naomi Watts and the relationship between Ann and Kong.

TJL
12-31-2005, 02:33 AM
I finally saw "King Kong" this afternoon, and I enjoyed it.
While I don't think it was as amazing as all the critics said, it was a great film, and Peter Jackson should be proud of his work.
The New York City scenes were absolutly stunning. My hat is off to those guys, they really did a fantastic job at creating a CG version of Manhattan.

I highly reccomend the movie. A phenominal achievement.