PDA

View Full Version : Media Celebrate 2,000 U.S. Dead in Iraq


Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 12:33 PM
Media Celebrate 2,000 U.S. Dead in Iraq
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/10/26/94745.shtml



Reporters who ignored the countless acts of heroism by U.S. troops in Iraq, not to mention the incredible progress their efforts have yielded, suddenly can't get enough of the fact that 2,000 of America's heroes have died.

In New York, Wednesday morning's newspapers headlined the news of U.S. dead with what seemed like macabre glee.

"2,000 Dead: As Iraq Tours Stretch On, a Grim Mark," blared the New York Times front page.

Peace Mom Cindy Sheehan is paying tribute to the fallen heroes by stepping up her work to oppose their efforts, pledging to chain herself to the White House fence until President Bush agrees to cut and run.


Almost nowhere in today's coverage will readers find a tribute to the titanic accomplishments purchased with the blood of these same lost heroes who believed in the cause.
Nowhere but here, that is.

Start with news that the vote on Iraq's constitution has finally been tabulated. It was ratified by a staggering 79 percent margin - making Iraq the first Arab country to approve a constitution in free election.

Another important benchmark ignored by the press would be the dramatic plunge in violence that accompanied the Oct. 15 vote. Insurgent attacks on polling stations dropped from 347 during January's election to a minuscule 13 - thanks, due in large measure, to the increasing competence of U.S.-trained Iraqi security forces.

Newsbusters.org Tom Segal recently put together a compendium of U.S. achievements in Iraq. Highlights include:

• In Sadar City, 86.5 million dollars in infrastructure improvements have been completed and another $246 million are ongoing. These include increased drinking water and electricity to serve more than 240,000 people.


• Soldiers from the U.S. 7th Infantry Regiment joined local contractors in cleaning up the roads and repairing broken sewer pipes in Abu-Dashir. At the same time four new substations opened and provide power to the electrical distribution system serving 1.3 million residents of Basrah.
• In Mosel, a substation expansion project has doubled the capacity of a 400kV transmission line to Baghdad and now provides in increase in the amount of power to the entire country. This addition impacts more than 6 million people.

• In the same city, three new police stations have been built and are manned, increasing local security. The main railway station has been completely renovated and is in operation.

• The Iraqi Special Forces Barracks in Baghdad has been completed along with five military company barracks and one senior barracks. Included were utilities consisting of potable water, septic tank and electricity. At the same time it is reported that construction is 95% complete on a 21.9 million dollar public works and water project for the capitol city.

But rather than celebrate the tremendous progress achieved by America's heroes, the press has consistently dumped on their work.

In a study released two weeks ago, the Media Research Center noted:

"Network [news] coverage has been overwhelmingly pessimistic. More than half of all stories (848, or 61%) focused on negative topics or presented a pessimistic analysis of the situation, four times as many as featured U.S. or Iraqi achievements or offered an optimistic assessment (just 211 stories, or 15%)."

By its attempts to trash the U.S. war effort, the press betrays its true feelings about America's heroes - and those feelings have little to do with honoring their sacrifices.

James"Thunder"Early
10-26-2005, 12:39 PM
The media isn't celebrating, their stating the truth. 2000 troops are dead and that's a reality. The truth shouldn't be covered to protect Bush.

Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 12:42 PM
The media isn't celebrating, their stating the truth. 2000 troops are dead and there is no end in site and that shouldn't be covered up to protect Bush.

Come on Doc. You know it was pure sarcasm that was put in the title. Can you not comment on the body of the article that states you never hear anything good from the media? Don't you think they're stating the truth?

Dr. John Becker
10-26-2005, 01:12 PM
I think the media is very happy about the 2,000th death to be honest.
They could care less about the soldier or the soldier's family, just their mission to embarrass Bush. I don't want the media to sugarcoat anything either, but it would be nice to hear the good news as well as the bad news.

James"Thunder"Early
10-26-2005, 02:41 PM
I think the media is very happy about the 2,000th death to be honest.
They could care less about the soldier or the soldier's family, just their mission to embarrass Bush. I don't want the media to sugarcoat anything either, but it would be nice to hear the good news as well as the bad news.What is there to be happy about? The truth speaks for itself and if that makes the President look bad, tough. Anybody who cares about the soldiers or their families wouldn't support the war.

Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 02:48 PM
What is there to be happy about? The truth speaks for itself and if that makes the President look bad, tough. Anybody who cares about the soldiers or their families wouldn't support the war.

You still have not commented about the body of the article. Are you afraid to actually have to say that there is truth in the story?

James"Thunder"Early
10-26-2005, 02:52 PM
You still have not commented about the body of the article. Are you afraid to actually have to say that there is truth in the story?The media covered the elections and the constitutional referendum. I also heard them say violence was low before and during the election. Even with those things, bad things are still happening.

Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 02:56 PM
The media covered the elections and the constitutional referendum. I also heard them say violence was low before and during the election. Even with those things, bad things are still happening.

"Network [news] coverage has been overwhelmingly pessimistic. More than half of all stories (848, or 61%) focused on negative topics or presented a pessimistic analysis of the situation, four times as many as featured U.S. or Iraqi achievements or offered an optimistic assessment (just 211 stories, or 15%)."

So would you say that the media has been fair in their coverage of the good and the bad that have been going on over there?

Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 03:05 PM
"Network [news] coverage has been overwhelmingly pessimistic. More than half of all stories (848, or 61%) focused on negative topics or presented a pessimistic analysis of the situation, four times as many as featured U.S. or Iraqi achievements or offered an optimistic assessment (just 211 stories, or 15%)."

So would you say that the media has been fair in their coverage of the good and the bad that have been going on over there?


Where'd you go Doc? Unable to give an honest answer?:confused: Or are you still debating with yourself about how the Bush admin is corrupt but the Clinton one wasn't.

James"Thunder"Early
10-26-2005, 03:08 PM
"Network [news] coverage has been overwhelmingly pessimistic. More than half of all stories (848, or 61%) focused on negative topics or presented a pessimistic analysis of the situation, four times as many as featured U.S. or Iraqi achievements or offered an optimistic assessment (just 211 stories, or 15%)."

So would you say that the media has been fair in their coverage of the good and the bad that have been going on over there?I honestly don't believe the coverage has been unfair. Just because they don't cover every little good thing that happens, doesn't mean they are biased.

Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 03:53 PM
I honestly don't believe the coverage has been unfair. Just because they don't cover every little good thing that happens, doesn't mean they are biased.

Just the answer I thought you'd give.:rolleyes: So these figures are basically just something that someone made up. Death and destruction sells better than progress in the medias eyes apparently.

Ags2000
10-26-2005, 05:33 PM
Peace Mom Cindy Sheehan is paying tribute to the fallen heroes by stepping up her work to oppose their efforts, pledging to chain herself to the White House fence until President Bush agrees to cut and run.


Any chance of her expiring due to lack of food, water or...ya know...a car running into the fence? :joke:


D

Bobby F.
10-26-2005, 06:37 PM
Any chance of her expiring due to lack of food, water or...ya know...a car running into the fence? :joke:


D


:lol: I have a hard time taking anything she says seriously with that high pitched voice ahe has and the way she says "umm" after every 5 words.

Dr. John Becker
10-26-2005, 06:40 PM
I wish Bush would sue her for slander, after all, she did say that Bush murdered her son.

Kay Scarpetta
10-26-2005, 07:27 PM
Peace Mom Cindy Sheehan is paying tribute to the fallen heroes by stepping up her work to oppose their efforts, pledging to chain herself to the White House fence until President Bush agrees to cut and run.

I think she should honestly have a psychiatric evaluation. The woman has a screw or two loose.

RWCTV
10-28-2005, 06:25 PM
The media isn't celebrating, their stating the truth. 2000 troops are dead and that's a reality. The truth shouldn't be covered to protect Bush.


Granted, but there is something that has to be said when you are highlighting death tolls of U.S. troops for days and not highlighting the death's we have initiated on terrorists. I believe there is a sense of pride in this. It's a way to say, "look, I told you so." I have heard about this story now for the 3rd day in a row, and I am already sick of it. When we have positive milestones, they are mentioned, but you have to catch them before they are buried. When it seems to go against the president, it is like the story is pinned down, showcased for a several days, and then discussed by the talk media establishment, giving it even more publicity. When it is good news it's on page one of the Conservative publications, buried in the liberal papers (like the New York Times), talked about on conservative talk shows for a day, and then leaves unless the subject needs to be brought up to make a point.

The news is covered differently if it makes the president look good than if it makes the president look bad.

Stormtracker TF
10-28-2005, 06:44 PM
Granted, but there is something that has to be said when you are highlighting death tolls of U.S. troops for days and not highlighting the death's we have initiated on terrorists. I believe there is a sense of pride in this. It's a way to say, "look, I told you so." I have heard about this story now for the 3rd day in a row, and I am already sick of it. When we have positive milestones, they are mentioned, but you have to catch them before they are buried. When it seems to go against the president, it is like the story is pinned down, showcased for a several days, and then discussed by the talk media establishment, giving it even more publicity. When it is good news it's on page one of the Conservative publications, buried in the liberal papers (like the New York Times), talked about on conservative talk shows for a day, and then leaves unless the subject needs to be brought up to make a point.

The news is covered differently if it makes the president look good than if it makes the president look bad.
Well said.

Since most of the media has a liberal slant to it anyways, of course they're going to be more than happy to throw this milestone in anywhere they can. The war was completely a mistake in their eyes...So why not make the "mistake" look worse, just to make Bush look bad? C'mon...They may not be happy that 2000 of our troops died, but they sure are glad they have something new to help turn the public away from Bush.

Dr. John Becker
10-28-2005, 07:49 PM
Well said.

Since most of the media has a liberal slant to it anyways, of course they're going to be more than happy to throw this milestone in anywhere they can. The war was completely a mistake in their eyes...So why not make the "mistake" look worse, just to make Bush look bad? C'mon...They may not be happy that 2000 of our troops died, but they sure are glad they have something new to help turn the public away from Bush.

:thanks:

You can't convince a liberal that the media is biased though.:lol: