Why was the WW3 thread locked?

[Munsters#1]

I just saw the WW3 thread. http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=146066

Why was it locked?

[theshark8777]

I would imagine it was for this line "In the age of bombing and everything else going on,Do you think that we should throw the Nucular bomb at Aghanstan getting rid of it for once and for all."

[theshark8777]

Also I just noticed, It's spelled Nuclear.

[Howdoulikemenow333]

Also I just noticed, It's spelled Nuclear.
Forgive on miss spelling the word. It's a poll, I read the other poll on yahoo news,I geuss the they can delete it.

[ABlairican Pie]

Afghanistan is NOT the cause of what's wrong in the world today, nor is Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Britain, or even the United States. The problem is human nature in general. We should not have to bomb anyone to prove our point. History has honored the leaders of peace and non-violence in the world. To "bomb Aghanistan" to cure our problems is absolute stupidity. We went into Aghanistan for noble purposes, to bomb them into oblivion just because we're frustrated is total abject moral failure.

[theshark8777]

And all the places where I would think there would be a possibility of nuclear war, I don't think Afghanistan is one of them.

[Munsters#1]

Afghanistan is NOT the cause of what's wrong in the world today, nor is Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Britain, or even the United States. The problem is human nature in general. We should not have to bomb anyone to prove our point. History has honored the leaders of peace and non-violence in the world. To "bomb Aghanistan" to cure our problems is absolute stupidity. We went into Aghanistan for noble purposes, to bomb them into oblivion just because we're frustrated is total abject moral failure.

I really wonder what the world will look like 10 years from now. Will we ever be peaceful?

[Janice]

Well, since a moderator (not me) locked the original thread on this topic, it's not right to re-open the discussion.